‘Euroleaks’.

Varoufakis leaks recordings of secretive Eurogroup talks on Greece in fight for ‘democratization of the EU’.

read the article..
https://www.rt.com/news/483140-euroleaks-varoufakis-troika-recordings/
_

Scientists measure electron spin qubit without demolishing it.

A group of scientists from the RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science in Japan has succeeded in taking repeated measurements of the spin of an electron in a silicon quantum dot without changing its spin in the process.

read the article..
https://phys.org/news/2020-03-scientists-electron-qubit-demolishing.html
_

first extraterrestrial protein found inside a meteorite.

A team of physicists in the US believe they may have discovered the first extraterrestrial protein known to man, within a meteorite that fell to Earth some three decades ago.

read the article..
https://www.rt.com/news/482084-extraterrestrial-protein-discovery-meteorite/
_

‘Oppression, arbitrary detention & torture will happen to journalists if extradition is successful’ – Assange’s father.

If Julian Assange’s transfer to the US isn’t stopped, other journalists and publishers face the imminent risk of being persecuted, detained or even tortured, his father exclaimed as his extradition trial got under way in London.

read the article.. https://www.rt.com/uk/481550-assange-father-extradition-trial/
_

Julian Assange’s US extradition hearing begins.

A London court is set to begin hearings to determine whether or not jailed WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange will be extradited to the US on charges of conspiracy where he faces life in prison.

read the article.. https://www.rt.com/news/481432-assange-extradition-hearings-begin/
_

time is not constant.

if you take a single moving molecule, it seems like entropy has occurred — time has passed — by the movement, but if the molecule arrives back to the same location, then no time has passed for its reference frame. even if the molecule will arrive to the exact location after millions of years, taken from the reference frame of other substances with changed entropy, for the molecule which had arrived back, nothing has changed in its location, its frame of reference, like time has not passed, or is turned back. it is very unlikely event though, by the probability, but because there are countless interactions of molecules and particles, then it does happen countless times as well. of course, way more often happens in the universe, that while there is a great change in entropy for some substances, then in other substances nothing changes for millions of years — the time isn’t changing there because there is no change in entropy. time is only the measure of entropy, not a constant flow by itself, thus time is flexible, dependent on the influencing factors on entropy, like gravity and temperature. again, there is no such thing as constant flow of time for all reference frames, even in our everyday life. i’m not talking here philosophically, but strictly about physical reality. the less change in entropy you have in your body, the less you age. it is also about your brain — it takes energy to keep your brain cells alive, to keep the connections and to create new connections. it requires effort. the less you care about things in the world, the faster rate of entropy you have in your brain, by the neglected brain cells dying out. it has an overall effect on your body. the less brain cells you have left, the less control your brain can exercise over the physical processes in your body, becoming less and less capable in repairing and replacing damaged cells. it results in the accumulation of damage, which we call aging.

please refer to my previous atrticles on entropy and time, and also on gravity, space and temperature, to have a better understanding.

_
my posts on the YE blog on the subject of entropy..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/?s=entropy
my posts on the YE blog on the subject of time..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/?s=time
_

the mistakes in lorentz transformation.

the problem with lorentz transformation is that during calculations the frames of reference are changed arbitrarily to fit the presumtions. if you stick to one reference frame from the beginning till the end then there will be no time dilation. the space-time interval comes directly from the lorentz transformation, and if i remember correctly, big part of the relativity conclusions by einstein was based on the lorentz transformation. you see where it is heading to?!

_
the errors in logic are clearly visible from the graphical representation of the lorentz transformation.. or to be precise — from several assumptions represented in the graphical form, plus the arbitrary transformation itself. watch the video below first, then read my detailed explanation of every mistake in the logic there.

just a note: the presenter in the video is not stupid, he talks by the book, but that’s the problem which i have encountered in so many academic discussions — some truths are considered not questionable, because some supposedly even smarter people have worked it out. nobody is perfect, so you should always question even the most established mathematical formulas. if not, then an error in logic can carry on into entire fields of mathematics and physics, wasting lives of generations of scientists trying to solve some issues, unsolvable with the formulas with errors in them. i wish i had more persistence decades ago, to insist on the clear errors in the theory of relativity, but back then i had no idea of the mistakes in the lorentz transformation, so i wasn’t absolutely sure i had my conclusions right.

watch the video presentation and i will explain the mistakes..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kefr8d2fHgE

so, lets discuss it..

in the beginning of the explanation the curve of different ticking clocks is arbitrarily bent — they should have been on the same level on the time scale. even worse — he sais time ticks slow to travelers, while in fact by this arbitrary graph the travelers had passed more time on the time scale, aging faster than the stationary observer — total contradiction. or, it would make “sense” only if the reference frames are arbitrarily taken, without a fixed reference point, resulting in a mathematical nonsense.

next. in the video, for the zero time of the moving object, the previously horizontal line of space axis is arbitrarily tilted to connect the 45 degree lines of light. big mistake. the connecting lines of light are very much of different length, which means they are not reaching the moving object at the same time. the horizontal plain of space axis should have been left unchanged, if the reference frame was stationary. the “sloped x-axis”, even if permitted to manipulate from the reference point of the moving object, is sloped in a wrong direction. the entire presentation is a total mess of arbitrary assumptions — it perfectly shows all the mistakes in the lorentz transformation initial inputs, and in the frames of reference.

the line of the moving object can never tilt beyond 45 degrees, which is correct, because it would mean exceeding the speed of light, but the connecting lines which are longer will show redshift while the shorter lines will show blueshift, if the space is expanding and contracting respectively. in the example though the light simply arrives at different times, not in zero time as presumed in video, by unknown to me logic.

i’m not done with the lorentz transformation yet — hold onto your chair. in the end of the video he grids up the traveler’s reference frame (with all the errors of logic in it) and squares up everything. why?! by the same logic he could as well square up the reference frame of the traveler without any transformation.

you see.. in the formulas without graphical visualization it is easy to misunderstand the connection of lines of time as a reference only, but in fact the lines represent physically passing time — the length of the connecting lines must be taken into account. only the vertical and horizontal axes must be taken as reference lines, without arbitrarily applying the same property of reference to the passing time. and again the issue with arbitrary reference frames — in case of space-time one cannot mess around with the frame of reference, because it would mean jumping space without time. if you want to change the frame of reference during your calculations, you must account for the passing of time during that change of space, which will nullify the whole point of lorentz transformation, because the time dilation will disappear.

the very idea of applying lorentz transformation for time dilation is absurd, it’s just an abstract mathematics full of logical errors not corresponding to reality. the time dilation don’t take into account the complex movement of celestial objects in aether. read the article to get a clarification about aether — it is there and proven, just not in all the textbooks yet..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/10/the-biggest-lie-in-the-universe-literally-the-claim-that-aether-doesnt-exist/
.. the displacement of galaxies related to each other is already with the speed of millions of kilometres per hour, so if an object takes a hike from earth it may in fact be slowing down, relatively speaking, instead of speeding up, or even more realistically, as earth also orbits sun, and solar system has its orbit in galaxy, then a “stationary” observer will be wobbling around. but that’s not the real point. the real point is that the relativity principle is not preserved during lorentz transformation. all those calculations and graphs are based on the presumtion — on a thought experiment with a flaw in it — that time moves slower on a moving object close to speed of light. the mistake in lorentz transformation is visible not only from its graphics, but from the very presumption that a speed of an object slows time. i have written about it before — if you perform the same calculations after flipping the stationary and moving reference frames, then the slowing of time will be result for another object, not to the same as before. both results, directly opposite, cannot be correct at the same time.

here’s an article with the detailed description of the error in the theory of relativity..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/12/the-clocks-paradox-not-resolved-contrary-to-claims/

it’s time for the mathematical community to wake up and scrap lorentz transformation for time dilation, with whatever consequences it may bring to the understanding of reality.

show me the lorentz transformation with correct input of data and with a single reference frame for the duration of the entire calculation. then perform the same for each reference frame separately, without mixing them arbitrarily.. and come to the same answer with each separate calculation. it is impossible. if you can do it, i will take my words back and will post an article that i was wrong.

the missing antimatter explained. the grand bang theory.

the missing antimatter could be explained simply: the aether exists everywhere, also beyond our universe, and different universes with more antimatter than matter are floating in the ever present aether. the universes are different similarly as stars in the universe have different elements in them. all the universes in the aether balance out the amount of matter and antimatter to total sum of zero.

it also means that entanglement of particles could exist between different universes and we may be able to get information about the other universes.

the process of creation of several universes at once could explain the rapid expansion in our early universe. after the initial uniformed expansion, the areas with the equal amount of matter and antimatter collapsed back to nothing, contributing to the more rapid expansion (inflation) of the area which is now our universe. it could perhaps be proven, as the previous surrounding areas, the other early universes which had collapsed, should have left some measurable traces to our universe.

the big bang could have been even bigger, a grand bang, but after the annihilation of matter and antimatter in large areas, the distances between the rest of matter had grown so large, that it limited the reach of interactions of forces. then the grand bang resulted in different lumps, in different universes.

true nothingness as singularity of reality.

here i explain why true nothingness has instant presence with no time lag, instead of no presence at all. first of all, again, true nothingness is not the absolute nothingness, because the observable existence excludes the absolute nothingness as a possibility. contrary to the abstract notion of absolute (exclusive) nothingness, the true nothingness below the quantum reality has properties. true nothingness is real, because without it there would be no structure in universe — true nothingness is the ultimate wall, stopping anything from collapsing any further under great pressure, connecting observable reality only by quantum entaglement. because gravity and time are interrelated, and true nothingness has no gravity, then the speed of time is infinite, which is the same as time is instant, without a lag. the instant time in true nothingness can also be viewed from its different property — as true nothingness has no space, as it is the singularity of reality in itself, it needs no time for the effect to take place, in any location. this is why the effects of quantum entanglement are instant.

the imaginary abstract absolute nothingness cannot be in touch with any possible observable reality. in contrast, the true nothingness, is in touch with the universe, it arises from the universe, from the observable reality — it is one of the fundamental properties of the universe.

the true nothingness, the singularity of reality, isn’t a single invisible point somewhere in the universe, beyond universe, or simply an imagination — it is everywhere, below the observable and measurable reality, connecting the universe into one entity with instant exchange of information. particles and waves cannot pass through the singularity, but information by the entanglement can — the information is present everywhere, about the whole universe.

about the redshift of distant galaxies.

there can be another explanation to the redshift than the expansion of the universe. as empty space is not totally empty, has mass and gravity, then it has effect on time. the more mass and gravity is between distant objects, the more it slows time, which creates the redshift of distant galaxies. no expansion of universe means no “dark” energy needed, to account for the expansion. this makes perfect sense while considering that background gravity is uniformly distributed, coming from quantum fluctuations in empty space. it is slowing the passing time (speed of entropy) just enough to stretch the light into longer wavelengths. the redshift of distant galaxies could be due to dragging of the light.

there may be something missing in this idea.. but maybe not. i have made mistakes before, in case of the redshift, thus i must think more and learn again about some things in physics — especially to find out if the textbook theories still hold true or are already considered inadequate.

_
by the way, some of the errors in my previous posts i don’t correct, to see myself later how my thinking and knowledge has evolved. as i’m not a professionally trained physicist then i can permit to myself to have errors in my descriptions of reality — i have no job of a professor to lose, nor degrees or tenures. nevertheless i do my best to get to the truth, and to correct at least the errors of syntax.. and also expressions of thoughts, adding clarifying comments if necessary.. in some older posts as well from time to time.

the properties of true nothingness.

sounds strange, doesn’t it.. true nothingness cannot have properties. well, it can, bacause i’m not talking about absolute nothingness (exclusive nothingness), which no-one can even think of, because we exist. the absolute nothingness as such is impossible by the very existence of something. so, lets not talk here about the impossible absolute nothingness, but the true nothingness, the nothingness below the quantum reality.

as soon as you think of true nothingness, it creates properties for it — the very least property of true nothingness is that one is able to think about it as absense of something. and here comes the answer: absense of time, thus an instant effect, and absense of gravity, are the first two real properties of true nothingness. the empty space of our universe has time and mass, and thus also gravity. without time the quantum fluctuations wouldn’t exist. time and gravity are inter-related phenomena — as time in the empty space hasn’t an infinite speed, then there is a non-zero gravity.. and gravity doesn’t exist without mass.. and empty space has its energy due to its mass. to go on in circles — without time in empty space there would be no mass and no energy — mass and energy without an effect in space have no meaning.

the empty space is not true nothingness — it has measurable properties. in contrast, the true nothingness has no time, no gravity, and also no mass and no energy, but it is everywhere at the same time due to having no time, no time lag, being instant. below the quantum reality, the true nothingness has an instant effect when you try to press onto it — to squeeze it, and that’s the only way the properties of true nothingness manifest themselves — by the absense of the properties of something. while being the medium of entangled instant interactions in our universe, you can’t do without true nothingness.

if there was no such thing as true nothingness in our universe, then quantum field would have collapsed into something else below it. the true nothingness is what gives the universe its properties through the absense of those properties in itself. without true nothingness with the described properties — with no values of any sort and instant presence everywhere, below the quantum reality, our universe would be unstable. thus the true nothingness, as strange as it may sound, gives for the universe the stability we observe.

read more about true nothingness..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/?s=nothingness
_

about reincarnation — from the point of view of physics.

without any abstract philosophy, but coming from the laws of physics only, due to the fact that information cannot simply disappear, that creates foundation for reincarnation. it will be highly improbable coincidence though, that one person reincarnates in the body of another, or in other words, that the wisdom of one person finds its way into new body. the information gathered through lifetime of a living organism will disperse into universe. even the most secret thoughts will become available for others to tune into. the information which was locked in someone’s body and mind, will be freed.

some mothers sense the death of their children instantly, because of the entanglement. the sudden large changes in the structure of body will most strongly be felt by those who are entangled the most, with another one. not only death, but also sudden illness or accident are possible to sense that way. or even just the state of being in extreme stress. but the information will still be locked inside the body of the affected person. only after death, most of the information is dispersed into universe as fields. in any case, reincarnating into another person with whole the information is highly improbable, but it doesn’t contradict the laws of physics in general.

squeezing the nothingness.

the ever increasing gravity and slowing of time is due to the ever stonger squeezing of nothingness by the forces between real particles. something must give. as it is impossible for anything to collapse into true nothingness, then it is the time that gives, with the reduced speed of entropy, balanced out with increasing level of gravity. by that theory, it is possible to create an artificial gravity by squeezing a volume in space without extra matter added — thus this theory is testable in a laboratory with extremely sensitive equipment. it would also prove the hypothesis of the counteraction of true nothingness.

to go a bit further, theoretically it is then possible to create anti-gravity by stretching the empty space, but then there must be found a way to block the creation of virtual particles in the total vacuum. unfortunately, the speeding of time will counterbalance the anti-gravity effect, meaning that the theoretical traveler on such device will age very quickly. only robots could handle traveling on anti-gravity devices.

read more:
my posts on the YE blog on the subject of gravity..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/?s=gravity
my posts on the YE blog on the subject of time..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/?s=time
_

randomness in quantum fluctuations explained.

here i continue from the theory that true nothingness is not an abstract notion but a real phenomenon. read the related articles..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/?s=nothingness

as true nothingness has no measure, has no space and no time and no any other value, then it is nowhere and everywhere at the same time. it is below the level of zero-point energy and virtual particles, connecting everything instantly through the nothingness. universe only seems separated, while it is united below the measurable level, by the nothingness. universe is highly entangled, since the big bang, thus the quantum fluctuations only seem random, while in fact these are the effects by balancing out the collective information of other fluctuating entangled parts. it is very improbable that all the entangled parts are all fluctuating in one direction and with the same speed at the same instant of time, thus only a small resulting counterbalace fluctuation is visible in any given point, but it is not random. we simply don’t know where the other entangled parts in the universe are, thus we can’t see the perfectly balanced and predictable fluctuations. any given quantum fluctuation only seems to be random, while in fact there is a cause and effect through countless entangled elements in the quantum field.
_

quantum entanglement explained.

it is just my theory, but it makes sense to me. for beginning one must think about gravity and time as emergent “force like” effects from quantum fluctuations, the result of impossibilty of anything to completely disappear into absolute nothingness.

as nothingness has no properties, like time or space, then particles created together become entangled through the impossibilty of collapsing into nothingness. after one particle gets its value then entangled particle is forced to take an opposite value to keep the balance. it happens instantly, because the “medium”, the true nothingness, has no space nor time. to me it appears that the true nothingness is not just an abstract notion but a real phenomenon, solving some issues in physics.

to understand it, read my articles about nothingness..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/?s=nothingness

the double-slit experiment with separately shot particles explained.

to me it is obvious that in the double-slit experiment, the particles aren’t moving inside a void, but are pushing through a medium, creating waves, which interfere while moving through the slits. particles are simply following the waves they are riding. the medium, which is not the related field of the particle, must be some universal field for all types of particles. again, the existence of aether solves the problem. is the aether related to true nothingness, which i have thought about a lot, and written on the blog some conclusions? i don’t have an answer yet. but the double-slit experiment doesn’t create any controversy, when the existence of aether is taken into account.

read the article..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/10/the-biggest-lie-in-the-universe-literally-the-claim-that-aether-doesnt-exist/
_

new graphene-based battery technology.

While at the proof-of-concept stage, a new bendable graphene-based supercapacitor shows enormous potential as a portable power supply in several practical applications including electric vehicles, phones, and wearable technology.

read the article..
https://scitechdaily.com/next-generation-energy-storage-breakthrough-fast-charging-long-running-flexible/
_

the problem with gravity. and a possible answer what it is.

perhaps it is an open secret, but there are clear cues that physicists themselves don’t believe in the theory of relativity in its entirety. if you believe einstein, that gravity doesn’t really exist as a force, but is just an effect we witness due to the curvature of space-time created by the mass of objects in space, then there would be no need to search for gravitons and the related field. nevertheless, the search is going on. there are also other theories of gravity proposed by physicists, which i have written about (see the links to my articles below). all that proves at least one thing for sure: the theories put forward by albert einstein help to explain some phenomena better, but obviously not the best way.

in my view, big part of the hassle around the relativity theory is allegorically comparable to the complex explanation of the universe by the ptolemy’s view point, while the copernican model would do the explaining way easier. the “copernican” model of gravity is not found yet. there is a longstanding problem in physics, the countless attempts to unify general relativity with quantum physics, which would be possible with a theory of quantum gravity.

the solution i am proposing is to regard gravity as an interrelated phenomenon with time and entropy, thus with statistics and probability. it is explainable that way as a relation of effects, but the causes of gravity and time are not explained with probability. the causes i will explain below.

as always, when i am not absolutely sure about my conclusions (in the absence of mathematical proof), i post a “disclaimer” that one should look at my logic with a critical mind, trying to find errors in my reasoning. or to help me with proving my theory with calculations.

so, here’s the theory.. or rather a definition which comes from my theory:

gravity and time, which are interrelated, are force like effects which we observe due to the impossibility of anything existing to collapse into absolute nothingness, getting their emergent properties from quantum fluctuations.

errors after errors, but popular ones — either on purpose or from blind belief.

if you listen to the explanations about time dilation due to speed, then most of them are wrong. they contradict themselves. especially those who claim that time dilation due to speed is proven with the atomic clock tests on planes and on gps satellites, which must make adjustments because their clocks are running faster. wrong proof! that only proves the effect of lower gravity in higher altitudes, away from earth, not the time dilation. due to time dilation, on the high speed satellites and planes, the time must go slower, not faster. total contradiction.

i wonder how one can tell the entire story and then not to see the mistake? mental blindness or copying from old textbooks without thinking? or perhaps making the errors on purpose to get attention and countless comments — in other words to become popular and monetize the controversy. thus.. i’m not publishing any of those wrong explanations here — internet is full of them anyway.

whenever you listen to or read an explanation, put your mind into it — too many of the theories out there come to a wrong conclusion, often exactly contrary to the logic from their own explanation.

_
below i post an explanation that makes more sense, regardless that i don’t agree with the time dilation part due to speed only. the eccentricity of the orbit of the satellites creates negative and positive acceleration, a local gravitational effect, which is more likely to be the cause of the time dilation, not the pure speed.

below in an excerpt from the article..
https://www.e-education.psu.edu/geog862/node/1714

Relativistic Effects on the Satellite Clock.

Albert Einstein’s special and general theories of relativity apply to the clocks involved here. At 3.874 kilometers per second, the clocks in the GPS satellites are traveling at great speed, and that makes the clocks on the satellites appear to run slower than the clocks on earth by about 7 microseconds a day. However, this apparent slowing of the clocks in orbit is counteracted by the weaker gravity around them. The weakness of gravity makes the clocks in the satellites appear to run faster than the clocks on earth by about 45 microseconds a day. Therefore, on balance, the clocks in the GPS satellites in space appear to run faster by about 38 microseconds a day than the clocks in GPS receivers on earth. So, to ensure the clocks in the satellites will actually produce the correct fundamental frequency of 10.23 MHz in space, their frequencies are set to 10.22999999543 MHz before they are launched into space.

There is yet another consideration, the eccentricity of the orbit of GPS satellites. With an eccentricity of 0.02, this effect on the clocks can be as much as 45.8 nanoseconds. Fortunately, the offset is eliminated by a calculation in the GPS receiver itself; thereby avoiding what could be ranging errors of about 14 meters. The receiver is moving, too, of course, so an account must be made for the motion of the receiver due to the rotation of the earth during the time it takes the satellite’s signal to reach it. This is known as the Sagnac effect, and it is 133 nanoseconds at its maximum. Luckily, these relativistic effects can be accurately computed and removed from the system.

what is the universe expanding into?

if the answer was “nothing”, then nothingness can’t be a repulsive “force” (actually an effect that seems like a repulsive force due to the impossibility of something to collapse into absolutely nothing). nothingness cannot be a measurable entity, thus universe expanding into nothingness is not the right answer. it must be an infinite space with possibly different properties than our universe.

intro to my travel stories, all three parts, now available on podcast.

i have made good on my promise to post new stories which were already recorded. it took entire day to edit and format and equalize the sound levels, because i did it all on my android devices. the lack of disk space for the editing process forced me to uninstall tens of other large apps. anyway, now it’s done..

here’s the link to my podcast..
https://castbox.fm/podcasts/youthextension

direct links to the new stories, recorded this year..
my travels in soviet russia, intro 1 of 3, borders
https://castbox.fm/vb/229648928
my travels in soviet russia, intro 2 of 3, borders
https://castbox.fm/vb/230658956
my travels in soviet russia, intro 3 of 3, borders
https://castbox.fm/vb/230659299

_
for a while there may be no followup stories on podcast and no many writings coming on the blog, because i began working again selling street paper (a magazine which i mentioned before on the blog). the attempt to get a longer working permit, for a year, was not successful (the immigration claimed they had never received the official letter from the company), but the company managed to get me a new temporary work permit, for another three months. in switzerland, three months per year is the maximum time as temporary worker, for european citizens, thus for 2020 that would be it, i must pack my stuff then and leave. anyway, it’s good enough for me to work a bit for some pocket money, and then to move on.

in any case i keep working on some science issues, trying to find solutions, and if anything interesting comes up then i will write about it.
_

the rich and the poor. the smart and the stu.. not so smart.

i have talked too much science lately, lets talk about some social issues as well. i hear and read sometimes that poor and/or not so intelligent people shouldn’t have kids, that most of them engage in not so healthy behavior, pulling down the speed of development of the society. well, let see how humans became who we are — by natural selection, by mutations. if one lives a stable social life with healthy habits, then new mutations are rare. it is way more likely to get some genetic mutations when people are smoking, drinking hard and so on. not all the mutations are beneficial, but due to natural selecton, people with bad mutations will be wiped out, while those who survive difficult environment may carry extremely beneficial genetic traits. and about intelligence — those who are truly more capable than others, will show their talents to the society regardless of difficulties and social inequality. good life doesn’t mean that all the talents are applied, because there is no pressure. in some cases it’s rather contrary, because high society has own restrictions and family traditions, plus duties of keeping the prestige, not allowing every talent to thrive. thus, in conclusion, the society should give free booze to everyone, and free education of course. keep studying hard. and also.. keep drinking h… well, don’t.

a problem with hawking radiation.

the event horizon around black holes is an imaginary line, far from the black hole itself, thus virtual particle pairs appearing at the event horizon cannot be converted into real particles by taking energy from the mass of the black hole. furthermore, at the event horizon the virtual particle pairs can be converted into real particles both ways — outside and inside. as the extra energy needed to convert virtual particle pairs into real particles cannot be taken from the mass of the black hole, then it is taken from the gravitational field by slowing the rotational velocity of the black hole, both for the particles outside and inside the event horizon. because of stronger gravitational pull inside the event horizon, the virtual particles should become real particles more often inside the event horizon, and to increase the mass of the black hole after falling into it. in any case, the mass of the black hole, which is far from the event horizon, cannot be affected instantly, but the creation of real particles is possible. also those real particles, which are created outside the event horizon, will ultimately fall into black hole due to its gravitational pull. the hawking radiation created at the event horizon, must be going both ways, away from black hole and in the direction of black hole. black hole cannot evaporate — the mass of black hole can only increase, even if part of the radiation is measured coming from the black hole event horizon. the extra energy, for any radiation created at the event horizon to escape, to be visible or measured outside, will come from the gravitational field by slowing the rotation of the black hole.

please don’t take the logic described above as a verified conclusion, because i came to it by visualizing the processes in my mind, without any calculations.

my posts on the YE blog on the subject of aether..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/?s=aether
my posts on the YE blog on the subject of gravity..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/?s=gravity
_

a proposal to foundations for advancement of science.

there exist such foundations, and i propose they should create compensation packages (severance packages) to those scientists who disclose scientific taboos. the “truths” that are stilll in science textbooks but are wrong, known to many scientists but forbidden to talk about, must be disclosed. sure there are many scientists out there who are gagged by threatening them with losing job, and even titles in science, after speaking up. i think that for the advancement of science, the scientists who disclose the taboos, providing evidence for the mistakes in textbooks, with proofs of the new knowledge, must be protected. when scientists are fired for speaking up, then a foundation for advancement of science should compensate them for their lost income, and provide means to continue their research if they lost access to necessary technology for their research.

a strange idea.

the title is rather an understatement — it is a really strange idea, not just strange, what i was just thinking about.. but it comes as a logical conclusion from my previous post..

https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/12/why-quantum-fluctuations-exist/

the idea is as follows:

as nothingness is impossible and quantum fluctuations are the result of the impossibility of nothingness, then each quantum fluctuation must arise from the impossibility to collapse into nothing, therefore, nothingness must be a force not allowing anything to collapse into it. true nothingness as a force, it truly is strange, but it must be the case if there is no flaw in my reasoning. the fact that nothingness itself cannot really be a force, because true nothingness means abscence of anything, is not an obstacle — it only seems to outside observer like a force, because it is impossible for anything to completely disappear.

the logic may also bring me to the answer what is gravity: if true nothingess is a repulsive “force”, then a single quantum fluctuation is a carrier of attractive force of gravity, which in total sum results in zero energy. therefore, gravity is negative nothingness, and as nothingness has no time, then gravity is also carrier of time — more gravity means slower time, and less gravity means faster time. time as such, while unified in true nothingness, is then a separating “force”. it must be then space-gravity-time (SGT), not space-time (ST). or rather space-gravity-entropy-time (SGET). i must take a break i think.

why quantum fluctuations exist.

one may ask why the qauntum fluctuations exist in the first place.

here’s the definition of qauntum fluctuations: “Quantum fluctuations are a point change in the energy of a volume of space due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Therefore, a quantum fluctuation has no cause.”

i think there is a cause: the answer comes from the fact that absolute nothingness is impossible. i have written about impossibility of existence of nothingness, but i didn’t think before that this may be the reason for the existence of the quantum fluctuations.

in few years we may have quantum laptops.

Quantum engineers from UNSW Sydney have created artificial atoms in silicon chips that offer improved stability for quantum computing.

/…/

Scientia Professor Andrew Dzurak explains that unlike a real atom, an artificial atom has no nucleus, but it still has shells of electrons whizzing around the centre of the device, rather than around the atom’s nucleus.

“The idea of creating artificial atoms using electrons is not new, in fact it was first proposed theoretically in the 1930s and then experimentally demonstrated in the 1990s—although not in silicon. We first made a rudimentary version of it in silicon back in 2013,” says Professor Dzurak

/…/

“But what really excites us about our latest research is that artificial atoms with a higher number of electrons turn out to be much more robust qubits than previously thought possible, meaning they can be reliably used for calculations in quantum computers. This is significant because qubits based on just one electron can be very unreliable.”

/…/

read the full article..
https://phys.org/news/2020-02-artificial-atoms-stable-qubits-quantum.html
_

time is energy.

as gravity slows time, and time is related to entropy which is a measure of spent energy, and also slows down with gravity, then it means that gravity is borrowing energy from time.

it’s just an idea.. got to think further. i noticed there are few science papers out there with the similar proposal that time is energy. need to dig into it now, to see what others think.

quantum fluctuations. gravity. structure in universe.

how stucture in the universe rises from the random nature of quantum fluctuations.

video below is very informative presentation, compact one — in just eight minutes is given current understanding of how stucture is rising from quantum fluctuations. but! listen to every word and all the sentences in the presentation carefully — don’t miss it that some parameters were put in by hand (in other words: made up), simply because we don’t know the correct values. i mean not in the beginning of the talk — about the ripples in the early universe — which he explains later where they came from, but in the end of the talk — the overall height of the ripples and “few other parameters”, like the amount of dark matter. it produced a theoretical graph, matching the graph to the actual measurements, resulting in “rather extraordinary fit”..

..wait a second.. hmm.. really?! i think it should be no surprise then.

anyway, regardless of some unknown precision, it’s a good presentation clarifying our current understanding, and the gaps in our understanding, how stucture in the universe rises from the random nature of quantum fluctuations..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4H1QPe6Bh4
_
read my article about randomness..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/11/about-randomness/
_

‘Intel coup of the century’.

CIA used Swiss encryption firm to spy on dozens of nations for decades.

read the article..
https://www.rt.com/news/480627-cia-spied-swiss-firm/
_
my comment..
what can i say.. i think it’s about time to begin using the personal encryption technique developed by Alex Kobold.. well, by me. it’s the safest method there is in the world (as far as i know) for certain type of short messages, and parts with sensitive data inside longer messages.
download the manual (book) for free – it should be easy to use by almost anyone..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2019/10/18/direct-links-to-download-my-books-synopsis-description-below/
_

the clocks paradox. not resolved contrary to claims.

the clocks paradox, also called the twins paradox. an error in the theory of relativity.

here’s a clear video presentation of the paradox, one minute long, without useless additional information or inserted secondary elements to mess with your understanding..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkHjBifJILA

there are some “solutions” to the paradox, by physics professors, using complex mathematics, showing solution with the difference in speed only, without the use of acceleration/deceleration. the academics are claiming that those physicists who explain the paradox with gravitational effect, don’t know what they are talking about. the problem with the complex math is that the professors fail to produce the calculations twice, beginning once from the reference point of one observer, and then from the reference point of another observer. that can only mean one thing — the math is wrong. there must be an error in the formulas. to prove the clocks/twins paradox with speed only, without local gravity produced by acceleration and deceleration, the math must be performed twice, once from each reference point, coming to a different result with the same formulas, which is impossible. there are careers involved, and tenures, thus it makes total sense for the professors to stop short before performing the same calculations again, from another point of reference in the clocks/twins paradox.

also there are some “solutions” described with the help of graphs (in the end of the article i give one example), but the same issue remains — there are clear logical errors. it is easy for anyone to debunk a “solution” without going into details of an explanatory presentation — simply let the demonstration to be performed twice, coming from each reference point. one must be able to, using exactly the same demo from the beginning till the end, without arbitrary changes to formulas or graphs, come to a different result from different reference point. they must show that in first demonstration the clock of one observer, who is the reference, is ticking faster, and on repeated calculation the clock of another observer, who is taken as reference, is ticking slower. it is impossible.

this is one of the contradictions in logic over which i was fighting with my physics teachers in my school times. i didn’t have a name to the paradox then, i just noticed the error. back then, for me the paradox of clocks was resolved by the existence of aether. in fact the whole trouble began when a physics teacher said that the aether doesn’t exist. then i came in with my logic that it will create problems in the theory of relativity. later i realized that even the existence of aether doesn’t resolve the paradox, because a “stationary” observer on earth may in fact be moving with enormous speed through the aether together with the earth or solar system or galaxy or cluster of galaxies, who knows. the speeding space ship will move in one direction through the aether, and then on another direction coming back to earth, in the result having the same amount of aether passed through the space ship as through the stationary observer on earth during the same time period.

thus the existence of the aether is not a solution to the relativity problem in clocks/twins paradox. it could only be a solution if earth would be stationary relative to aether. more probable is that our galaxy is closer to a stationary position in aether, which means that in different points of rotation around the galaxy and around the sun, the earth is moving at different speeds through the aether. this could be possible to measure and to find out the stationary reference point of the aether in the universe.

to those who missed my article on existence of aether read here..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/10/the-biggest-lie-in-the-universe-literally-the-claim-that-aether-doesnt-exist/

the only way to resolve the paradox is to revisit the theory of relativity critically. in my view the solution is in the effect of gravity, instead of the effect of speed. refer to my articles about it..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/06/common-mistake-in-description-of-time-travel/
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/05/how-gravity-affects-time-by-the-statistical-phenomenon-of-entropy/
_
the fact that technological advances in the precision of measurements and modern supercomputers have proven the theory of relativity to be correct many times, is not an obstacle to further scrutiny of the theory. some of the formulas may have errors in them. to put it into computer slang: “garbage in — garbage out”. this is in no way to diminish the value of current understanding in physics, i am simply saying that we are far from knowing everything and from being always correct. physics textbooks have been rewritten hundreds of times. nevertheless, the physics books have way more truth in them than holy scriptures.

_
to conclude the article, in the video below is an example of a popular, but wrong solution to the paradox. the connecting lines on the graph are there suddenly changing direction. if the reference point was the same, then the lines should have gone all in one direction on the entire length of the graph, or they show going back in time. the lines could only change direction, if in the middle of the graph the reference point was suddenly changed, arbitrarily, without finishing the explanation from the first reference point. and on top of that, the graph was fit into an assumption of slowing of time of a moving object from the very beginning. a correct presentation of a solution must give the correct answer in the end, with no arbitrary manipulation of data or presumption of facts.

watch the video..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sACUyf47mM

i have seen many such graphs, supposedly explaining different phenomena in physics, presented in a visually appealing form and told with a nice clear voice suggesting to listeners knowledge of the subject, but in fact are arbitrary drawings of graphs and pointless calculations fitting some presumed truths, a show-off for those who don’t know any better.

my advice is, don’t take any explanations without critical thinking, either from textbooks, popular ones on social media, or rare and new ones.. neither mine. i may also make mistakes. in any case i do my best to avoid any errors, thinking deeply before publishing my solutions. when i doubt in my understanding of a subject, then i state it next to the presented ideas, not to sound like i know the ultimate truth, misleading others and wasting their time.

my travels in soviet russia. audio story on my podcast.

well, to those who are not interested in my science articles, i must make good of the promise to post some new stories. the first story of the three part introduction was edited by my friend already over a month ago, thus i can post it now with no issues. further editing, of the part two and three of the series of introduction, must be done by myself — the vacation of my friend from his full time work has ended and he has no more free time now. maybe in the future he will lend me some assistance again and the process of producing podcasts will go faster.

you will find the first part of the intro story on my audio channel..
https://castbox.fm/podcasts/youthextension

below is also the direct link to the story, but probably you will need to install the app then (at least on an android device, on pc perhaps not). the link above works in the browser also on android, without the need to install the app.

my travels in soviet russia, intro 1 of 3, borders..
https://castbox.fm/vb/229648928

read the previously posted article to understand why there was a significant secrecy during recording of the intro to my new stories..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/08/the-story-of-my-life/
_
i will do my best to find the time to edit the other recordings in the near future. right now i work on some science issues, at the expense of eating well and with reduced sleeping time.
_

about randomness.

for over twenty years i’ve been studying randomness, including by computer simulations, writing my own programs for that purpose and studying the resulting graphs. i’ve been trying to visualize randomness, to find some structure, and i found some regularities, or probabilities in other words. the purpose of my long time effort has been to employ the findings in gambling, on roulette and stock market.. but that’s another story, described in one of my books..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2019/10/18/direct-links-to-download-my-books-synopsis-description-below/

i propose that randomness is truly random in linear form only, while with several dimensions involved it must be not so random after all — it must have some predictable regularities in order to bring form into the universe. if it isn’t the case then there must be an observer included from the very beginning of the universe, a mind, a creator. as i trust mathematics to be the language of gods, then only mathematics can explain the structure in universe rising from random fluctuations in aether (quantum foam).

this is a cue that should give me an answer to the nature of gravity, on which i’m still working on. in the past i have also published an explanation of gravity rising from the casimir effect, by the waves of cosmic scale pushing on nearby objects in space, which are close enough to cancel wavelengths of that scale between them. i cannot be expert in everything, thus that proposal was just out of the blue because i cannot be sure in the real effect — it should presuppose the existence of waves of such cosmic length, which are not measurable by current technology. thus i keep thinking on other explanations.

my starting point for the reasoning:
as the behavior of basic building blocks of the universe, beginning with quantum fluctuations, are random in nature, then all the phenomena in the entire universe must be possible to explain by the logic coming from the randomness, statistics and probability, which in cumulative effect, in what we see around us, emerges from the most likely scenario based on the mathematics, on randomness.

i’m still working on trying to explain gravity, but meanwhile there will be more articles showing some contradictions in the established science.

some additional comments in an article.

i have added some clarifying comments to a science article from a week ago..

how gravity affects time by the statistical phenomenon of entropy.
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/05/how-gravity-affects-time-by-the-statistical-phenomenon-of-entropy/

before posting the next article in science.

i must give an excuse to readers that the promised publishing of the new, already recorded stories about my past travels, is postponed for now, due to lack of time for finalizing the editing. in my list of priorities is trying to solve some cases in science way before telling the story of my life.

prior to posting a science article, my own take on some issues and contradictions, i spend lots of time revisiting particular truths in the established science, to be sure i got it all right. only then i post the article when i have made sure that my logic is correct.

for now, here’s another paradox to think about..

if the speed of light is constant regardless of point of observation, then the red-shift of distant stars moving away from us wouldn’t be possible. constant speed of light and the phenomenon of red-shift cannot be true both at the same time, one of them must be wrong. as red-shift is well observed phenomenon, then the speed of light being constant, proposed by einstein, isn’t true.
_

the biggest lie in the universe, literally — the claim that aether doesn’t exist.

the failed detection of the aether by michelson-morley experiment and what was wrong with it. and the new experiment that proved the existence of aether — published in science magazines without making into textbooks.

before i post my article about gravity i must explain some common misconceptions in physics, and bring clear examples where anyone can see the contradicting truths in physics.

i’ve been giving head aches to my physics teachers already when i was a schoolboy, with simple logic proving einstein wrong, but i thought back then that i must be missing something in the theory of relativity, so i wasn’t absolutely sure. still, in all the years i haven’t found an error in my logic and i found no new evidence in physics to prove me wrong. rather contrary — i found more lies in physics and i can’t understand how people fail to see the problems in their theories and/or experiments as those are so obvious. i repeat, as i’ve said it before, that i’m not a trained physicist in an academic level, so i cannot prove my theories with calculations. or, to be correct, rather i have no time to learn again all the mathematics which i have long forgotten — i have always been good at math and physics in the past, even coming up with my own math formulas on the spot during exams, when i couldn’t remember the learned ones, and got correct answers passing the exams. now i only use simple logic and try to picture in my mind the phenomena, which i learn about in science news.

thus, the “disclaimer” made, now i present some theories in physics and show my logic that proves the theories wrong.

not to throw at you too much information in one article, i present my understanding of the universe little by little. i present some classical explanations, with which i was never happy from the beginning, getting into arguments with physics teachers about mistakes in logic..

detecting the aether.

how come none of the physicists can see the flaw in logic and in the design of the apparatus with which the experiment was conducted: if there is slowing of light beam in one direction due to drag created by the aether, then it is cancelled out by speeding up of the light beam by exactly the same amount as it was dragged, when it returns after bouncing back from the mirror. after splitting, both beams must arrive to the same point at exactly the same time, no matter how you turn the apparatus and where on earth it is located. the only thing they could have demonstrated with that apparatus was the good building skills and precise calibration of the apparatus itself, but not the existence of aether.

watch the video and be surprised how blind the entire generations of physicists can be..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQSF99EtG8Y
(usually i try not to listen to this “scientist” because he — the first and last one talking on video — is a sellout. once a scientist promotes genetically modified food giving absolutely inadequate comparison with natural selection and selective breeding, that means the scientist can tell anything that makes money, without sticking to scientific truths. but on this video it makes sense to show his explanation, because he is wrong and that’s the point i’m making here.)

anyway, luckily i’m not the only one seeing the flaws in physics. there’s a proof now that aether does exist. the presenter of the lecture didn’t obviously realize the flawed design of the original experiment and didn’t know that the new experiment was done not just more precisely but with a different design of the apparatus, but he makes the point that the proof of aether is still not widely known..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aa97RtzjTsM
__

get ready to hear new stories.

so, now the old recordings are posted, not all but those which are closely related to my upcoming stories as i continue telling the story of my life. it will be a good idea to listen to the old recordings, all of them, to understand the following stories better. there’s already around three hours of new recordings about my travels across entire soviet russia, mostly in the time frame between 1989 and 1997, with some travels even earlier, in my country which was then part of soviet russia.

before i will publish the recent recordings, some more editing is to be done yet, for a better listening experience. i tested different recording options and i didn’t care too much about telling my story smoothly on one go. now i must pay for it with extra editing work to cut out bad sound and long pauses, with some repeatings as i struggled to find the correct words to express myself better. thus, as long as i’m messing around with different editing apps for the best result and the most comfortable editing work, you can listen to my older recordings about my time in soviet russian army and about my business life after the army, during the collapse of the soviet union when there was plenty of criminal activity around to deal with, in all levels of the society..

the podcast..
https://castbox.fm/podcasts/youthextension

the video channel..
https://youtube.com/YouthExtension

my books, all free to download and permitted to share..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2019/10/18/direct-links-to-download-my-books-synopsis-description-below/
_

meanwhile i also keep thinking on some issues in different sciences, and try to put some relations of physical phenomena into written form, to publish as articles. right now my main focus is to understand gravity. today morning i already wrote an article about it, but decided not to publish it yet. each time after publishing an article on the blog immediately there show up grammatical errors, as i realize how others may understand me differently not living inside my mind. i must read my writings over tens of times, correcting the wording, for there to be little chance to understand me wrong. if you have recently received emails (as a subscriber) with my science articles, then it will be a good idea to revisit the articles now on the blog — i have rewritten some of the articles, correcting the syntax and adding clarifying comments, to make my point absolutely clear. all the effort is directed to minimize the possibility for misunderstandings.
_

the story of my life.

for some time now i’ve been thinking about the format in which i should tell my story, the life i have been through. there are few things to tell which may get me into trouble again, since i’m still in exile and can’t return to my country without facing consequences of government corruption there.

i began telling my story on videos couple of years ago when i lived in italy. i posted the videos on youtube, but then happened the political discrimination (by several social platforms, including youtube) against free speech, blocking some known journalists. i decided to take down all my videos from youtube and discontinued sharing my posts on the social platforms which were restricting free speech, and were before linked through my wordpress blog. unfortunately, there are few free alternatives to get my stories out to a larger audience, particularly in video format, and one can’t really avoid using the services of those companies which are politically biased. i’m using the services of google anyway, because there are no better alternatives in some specific cases.

the videos of my stories were recorded with quite a bad quality, with a cheap chinese camera. i struggled to have and good sound — to keep sound stable on video i had to put random music to play in the room. a friend of mine said that the stories are very interesting but the music in the background was annoyingly disturbing. till now i haven’t been able to afford a good quality video camera, thus i opted to record audio only, testing different devices. there are few new stories recorded now, but first i will probably post again some videos which i recorded earlier, regardless of the bad quality — telling the same stories again is a kind of waste of valuable time in my opinion.. who is really interested to know will listen to the stories anyway. i know it because from time to time i happen to watch a video or listen to a podcast with a terrible sound, but i keep listening if the content is interesting.

i have considered telling my stories incognito, with a modified voice and under an alias, to avoid defamation claims, but after thinking about it literally for months, i decided not to hide my identity. in certain cases i must tell the stories without revealing the locations where something happened, or exact time, or without telling the names of people involved, all because i just don’t want to have any litigations in courts later, about supposed defamation or other reasons. i like to spend my time on studying new things in science, rather than on proving my point and rightfulness in courts, after telling the story of my life.

my recently recorded stories in audio may sound a bit secretive but now you know why, it’s because i was considering to publish the stories incognito. further on i will tell more details, perhaps, depending on the possible consequences to me and to others involved.

the old videos and the recent introduction stories in audio will follow soon. the videos are not edited, recorded in one go. the recent sound recordings are a bit edited — i put in a bit more effort now for a better listening experience. the sound is also possible to edit on my cheap android devices, thus i will probably be recording sound only in the near future, till i can afford a better technology, and can settle down somewhere without the need to be constantly on move, having my home in the backpack. in any case i will do my best not to need to edit anything, be it video or sound only, because it will be more natural, and it will save me valuable time as well, for learning new things.
_

my understanding of physics.. and politics.

i must post here a clarification: on my blog here are often described my theories, my ideas about reality, not always proven facts in physics. one should not take my blog as a physics manual but a source of ideas to think about certain concepts which are still largely disputed in physics, regardless that some of those concepts are provided as facts in textbooks. the textbooks may be rewritten after new discoveries in science. on my blog i’m writing about some phenomena as i understand them to the best of my capacity, which won’t make those ideas definitely correct, but only possibly correct. i keep learning and if i discover mistakes in my reasoning i will admit it. definitely my ideas about reality are worth thinking about, and to dispute the correctness if there are any errors in my logic.

contrary to physics though, my posts about politics must be true always, because in comparison with physics the logic in politics is very easy to see. behavior of people is completely transparent to anyone having done some research while using own capacity of brain, not relying just on fed in information by opposing views and political interests. one doesn’t need to be capable of reading minds, only to have an understanding about general layout of powers in world, to see who would benefit from what.

common mistake in description of time travel.

it is not possible for humans to come back to earth in a distant future while remaining young, by traveling in a theoretical super advanced spaceship. if the speed of spaceship is changed gradually, for humans to survive g-forces, it doesn’t matter how fast the spaceship will travel and for how long time, the entropy of human body will be almost the same on the spaceship and on earth — both will age with same speed. it is usually described that in fast moving spaceship travelers age slower. wrong. it is not the speed that matters but the difference in gravity, the g-force created by spaceship. perhaps a millisecond difference is possible to achieve only, over many years of constant acceleration and deceleration. to speed up and to slow down fast enough to have any significant effect on time, the local gravity (g-force) due to positive and negative acceleration must be so large that it would create an atom-thin pancake from human body. if on an advanced spaceship traveler will be protected in an anti-gravity capsule, then the traveler will age at the same rate as another one on earth, regardless that the spaceship itself will age slower, if it will survive the g-forces of such magnitude.

the only realistic way to travel in time is by slowing entropy of the body by freezing it deeply and later bringing it back to life, which is already successfully done with many small living organisms, like frogs, mice and others. some viruses have survived frozen for millions of years — those are the real time travelers and perhaps need counceling for a psychological shock after waking up in a modern laboratory. for humans, the only option for now is cryogenics with cryonics, in hope that the technology of the future will enable to bring them back to life by correcting damage done by today’s not so perfect technology, and wish that they won’t be then on the same developmental level as viruses are to us today.

turning back time.

theoretically it is possible to turn back time in some area of space, but not before the information about the moment in time has been stored in another area of space. as it is clear to me by now, time is a statistical phenomenon (read my previous article for details), same as entropy. turning back time means the requirement of being exactly at the same environment and condition as at some point in time in the past. therefore, by storing all the information of that moment and recreating it, fulfills the requirement. the fact that by the random nature of quantum fluctuations the following processes will never repeat exactly as before is not a problem, because who needs to return to the past to have exactly the same future — there you are anyway. recreating past will only be needed if someone wants to have a different outcome, to avoid the mistakes of the past. but philosophically speaking, there is no need to go to the past, if the technology will be there to recreate it – way cheaper than recreating the past and hoping to make no more mistakes, will be to create the now that is desired. after all, time is just a statistical phenomenon and rearrangment of particles. with the technology available to return particles to their previous arrangment is enough for eternal youth and elimination of whatever diseases on atomic level, without the need to find curing medication or protection against pathogens on molecular level. that said, first of all we need to realize what time really is. it is not an absolute ruler flowing one way only — it is just a statistical phenomenon taking toll on everything by the laws of mathematics. this means that applying right mathematics, the process of time and entropy can be stopped in some areas in space, on the expense of other areas in the universe, where increased rate of entropy is rather welcome.

for scientific explanation read my previous articles..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/05/how-gravity-affects-time-by-the-statistical-phenomenon-of-entropy/
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/04/entropy-without-space-time/

how gravity affects time by the statistical phenomenon of entropy.

it suddenly all began making sense to me now, how gravity slows down time, i mean why. time and entropy are related — without time there is no entropy and without entropy there is no time. entropy is a statistical phenomenon. when gravity increases, it decreases the number of possible configurations the matter can rearrange itself into at random, which means diminishing of the speed of entropy, which manifests in slowing of time.

you could therefore say that time is also a statistical phenomenon. when there is no rearrangments of particles there is no change in time. the time is frozen so to say. this is why in black holes time has stopped, because there is no internal changes. also in near absolute zero there should be almost no time flowing, thus devices frozen at near absolute zero could be left in the past to exchange information with future generations through entangled particles.
_

the above conclusion brings me to the idea, that as in the absolute zero temperature time doesn’t exist, it is as well the case in the absolutely maximum possible temperature in the universe, where all the particles are torn apart into their constituents, and dissolved into maximum entropy, stopping time. thus slowing of time can be achieved both ways, by freezing and heating, while somewhere in the middle should be the highest speed of entropy. if that maximum rate entropy is measured or calculated that would give us the number of the maximum possible temperature in the universe, at which there is no more entropy and time stops. even this is possible that at this absolute maximum temperature everything collapses into absolute zero — because with maximum entropy there is no more movement and everything freezes — and the cycle will restart.

it is also a possibility that this borderline temperature can fluctuate both ways, randomly or due to virtual particles. in this possibility, when our universe disperses completely and cools to absolute zero, it can randomly create itself again by flipping into absolute maximum temperature and starting to cool down, collapsing into real particles in the process and so on. this possibility suggests that universe may have began from not an infinitely small point, but from infinitely large space — an area of absolute minimum possible temperature flipped to absolute maximum possible temperature with the same value of entropy, with all the consequences visible in our local space now, in our universe.

i have tried to clarify to myself in written articles countless times, over many years, that speeding up particles in heated materials should slow down their local time. higher temperature creates higher deceleration/acceleration speed of bouncing particles, thus creating the instances of greater local gravity in the particles. for outside observer the local time in heated materials increases.

without getting all the details of the process, it may seem like a contradiction, because the time in heated materials should slow down to the outside observer due to the increased gravitational effect of deceleration/acceleration, thus i must explain further. as you know heated materials won’t change their total mass — the gravitational effect only increases to the particles themselves, while the entire volume of heated material is millions of times larger. if the observing point is inside the mostly empty volume of the heated material, then time moves faster due to increased speed of entropy, while time slows down for the observing point of riding the bouncing particles, at the moment of bouncing. for the entire heated matter the slowing of time of particles is “borrowed” from the surrounding space – after all, particles are just increased instances of waves in the field. outside of the heated material time goes slower compared to the time inside the heated material. that effect we can observe in everyday life in cooking procedures (increased rate of entropy) and by refrigerating food for it to last longer (slowed rate of entropy).

the point i’m making here is that time is flowing at different rate not only due to difference in gravity on different celestial objects, but also the difference in temperature makes time to flow at different rate. that means we can manipulate time with way less energy than it is needed to accelerate/decelerate big objects for the required gravitational effect.

there is no need for a cosmic voyage with enormous acceleration/deceleration of a space ship, creating huge local gravity to slow down time and to come back to earth of a distant future. a time machine could in theory be created by manipulating temperature of objects, by maintaining structural integrity of the time traveling objects by decreasing their entropy. the entropy problem could be solved by sending the original structural information of the time traveling object to the distant future by entangled particles. upon arrival to the destination the signal could be sent to the past requesting the information of the original stucture which will be provided and the object will be rebuilt. that reparation procedure could be repeated at any point during the time travel, before the stucture desintegrates beyond reparation, while the energy needed will be provided from the temperature difference. way easier than with gravity.

read also my post from yesterday..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/04/entropy-without-space-time/
_

entropy without space-time.

the currently held theory, that the universe began from singularity, or is at least a rebouncing event from a previous collapse into singularity, seems strange to me — it has a contradiction in it. as i understand, all explosions and inflations are result of entropy, and entropy as such is set by the laws of our universe. by the accepted theory, before there was our universe there was no such thing as entropy, the notion of time didn’t exist before the big bang. if that’s the case then the big bang had no principle to follow, to occur in the first place, because without entropy no explosion or inflation is possible. if the big bang theory is correct, in sense that it did happen as described, then in my view it could only be the case if entropy is the main law of everything, be it with or without any universes. this would mean that our local space-time and speed of light and other relatively fixed phenomena are not there to remain constant but to decay over time. this isn’t necessarily measurable in our visible universe but it has to be the case in principle, if the big bang theory is true. if there was nothing and entropy still existed as the main principle, then nothingess as such doesn’t exist, it cannot exist. the implications of it are significant: if entropy exists irrelevant of universe being present, it also means that time exists without universe, because entropy requires the notion of time.. and some type of space had to exist before the space-time of our universe because entropy and time have no place without space. you see the problem? the theory of big bang creating our universe requires a pre-existing space-time, perhaps a different one, but with entropy. what happened during the big bang was creation of elements with their anti-elements, while the principle of entropy with time and space has always been and always will be. the ever-present principle of entropy must exist in all areas of the infinite space: in the area of our expanding universe and in the areas where there is no matter or energy present for the time and entropy to manifest itself upon.

by the way, for me it has always made no sense that scientists call entropy a principle of ever increasing disorder. it should be called the principle of ever increasing order, contrary to disorder, or ever increasing equality, equilibrium. if our produced goods decay, become ever more disordered, it is so only from our point of view as humans, which is subjective. science shouldn’t be based on subjective reference points, but on stable ones. universe is way more stable reference point for scientific concepts. from the perspective of universe all decay of things (and also matter itself) is not into disorder, but into ever increasing equilibrium, ever increasing order. that in turn means that statistically everything should fall into order (most likely, over time), into its place in universe, by itself, without exerting external force to any system.

the principle of entropy, if named correctly as self-ordering principle, has implications beyond science, into politics and the best possible structure of a society. exerting force will create disorder while freedom will create order — derived from fundamental principles of universe.

my books still free to download, for now.

after considering all the positive and negative implications of selling my books i decided not to make them exclusively paid versions only. as with many things in life there isn’t a single most convincing reason for the decision, but rather a cumulative effect to what will follow, after eliminating my books from free download. so, for the time being i leave the books for readers to download for free and to share without limitations, later on will see. after all, i can write other books, better than previous ones, to make them paid versions only. for now, enjoy the knowledge shared in the books for free..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2019/10/18/direct-links-to-download-my-books-synopsis-description-below/
_

a message to friends

as you know i haven’t been using facebook for years. because of some of you, few weeks ago i began using instagram and whatsapp again but now i have removed the apps from my devices. we will find other ways to communicate.. 🙂 😉

Facebook censorship increasing.

Facebook is doubling down on censorship of anything less than villification of slain Iranian Major General Qassem Soleimani, deleting a clip showing his history of fighting terrorism – and demonetizing the account posting it.

The social media behemoth didn’t just remove independent journalist Dan Cohen’s ‘In the Now’ segment, “How ‘good guy’ Soleimani became US media’s ‘bad guy,” from the show’s page on Tuesday – it demonetized In the Now entirely, citing the typical unspecified violations of “community standards.”

read the article.. https://www.rt.com/news/478382-cohen-soleimani-video-censored-facebook/

The Personalized Meditation News.

Please refer to the promotional post from December..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2019/12/09/personalized-meditation-online-consultation/

The promotional period will soon be over. Please use the opportunity to register to the personalized meditation consultations and training now. In the end of January I will probably have whole my available time scheduled out because I’m working on several projects at the same time.

On the fliers which are distributed in town of Bern there’s written that my books are available on my blog to download for free — because of the publicity in town I will not take down the books from my blog till the end of January. After that will see how my talks will be going about selling the books. Personally I simply have no time for whole the marketing process, thus I’m currently in talks with a professional who would take care of selling and promoting my books.

The meditation advertisement is valid till whole my time is scheduled out..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2019/12/09/personalized-meditation-online-consultation/
__

free books soon gone from the blog.

my books which i have published for free on this blog i will soon remove from free download. the reason for this are the ongoing business talks and preliminary agreement that my books won’t be for free anymore when they’re being prepared for paid options. that’s it. use the opportunity now to download my books for free while you still can, maybe last few days..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2019/10/18/direct-links-to-download-my-books-synopsis-description-below/

stem cell treatment reverses aging in mouse brains.

In what could prove to be a game changer for us humans, scientists have discovered how to make old brains young and young brains stronger and more effective using targeted stem cell therapy on mice. /…/
By stimulating the neural stem cells in their brains, the old mice in the study successfully recovered their cognitive mapping ability, and remembered the layout of a given environment for far longer, effectively reversing the effects of the aging process on this particular skill. /…/

read the article..
https://www.rt.com/news/477932-stem-cells-reverse-brain-aging/

once done it well, never mess it up..

well, that’s my philosophy of taking iq tests: “once done it well, never mess it up trying to do it better.”

it happened in 2007 when i was in quite a depression while going to court with my ex-wife about access to my children. one late morning i had quite a hangover. i was checking my emails in a busy internet bar.. somehow i ended up on a website providing online iq tests and i thought about it.. what if something was wrong with me and not with my ex who was blocking my access to my boys. so i decided to give it a try. back then i was only a few years into learning english so it took me several readings of the questions to understand what was required. also, as programming was one of my hobbies i was used to make double and triple check of my calculations. all that slowed down the overall time of completing the test which is visible from the results. as english isn’t my first language then also the vocabulary part was less satisfying than the rest of the results. these are my excuses. but as i said in the beginning, i’m not trying to mess anymore with iq tests. in fact that was the only iq test i have ever taken, the first and the last one.. and i’m not planning to do it again. i don’t feel like i deserve such high results and consider it partly a good luck, perhaps answering some of the questions not really knowing what i was doing. all that said, it is still good to brag about the results when there’s an argument to make, in some life situations. 😉

not everything is there due to pure luck of course, i don’t feel myself being stupid.. ))

www.iqtest.com

Personal Intelligence Profile for Alex KOBOLD
General IQ Score (2007-02-10)

Your General IQ Score of 130 shows how able your mind is in general. Anyone with a General IQ Score this high is considered to be gifted. This score is better than 97.72% of all persons taking this test. Virtually all occupations can be comprehended with a General IQ this high. You should be able to handle almost all academic challenges.

You scored higher than your General IQ Score in 10 individual ability categories. None of these better scores could be called statistically significant.

Arithmetic

Solving many of the IQ Test’s problems required the ability to add, subtract, multiply, and divide numbers mentally. Many mental tasks require arithmetical operations even though numbers may not be involved, and thus number manipulation abilities can strongly indicate general intelligence.

Your Arithmetic IQ score of 133 is not significantly different from your General IQ score. This score is better than 98.61% of all persons taking this test.

Spatial Skill

Understanding what changes will occur when conditions vary is a deep and powerful ability of the mind. All invention and creativity of every sort is based upon this ability. Although test problems usually involve manipulation of objects in space, persons with a stronger ability to spatially manipulate can also be expected to use this ability to be able to better predict how social and psychological situations would change due to variation.

Your Spatial Skill IQ score of 127 is not significantly different from your General IQ score. This score is better than 96.41% of all persons taking this test.

Logical

This is the ability to determine if a set of rules has been correctly followed. This ability is most useful in combination with other mental skills listed above. Those with strong logical ability are quicker to see where a given set of conditions is going to lead, have a strong sense of justice, and better understand–from an intellectual analysis–the benefits of harmony.

Your Logical IQ score of 132 is not significantly different from your General IQ score. This score is better than 98.36% of all persons taking this test.

Spelling

The ability to spell can indicate general intelligence. Remembering a set sequence of letters indicates the mind’s ability to retrieve remembered facts. Learning how to spell and use the words of a language is almost a complete IQ test in itself. Although poor spellers with high IQ scores can be found, it is rare, and in general–everything else being equal–the better spellers have higher IQ scores.

Your Spelling IQ score of 138 is exceptionally higher than your General IQ score. This score is better than 99.44% of all persons taking this test.

Short Term Memory

The ability to remember things for a short period of time allows the mind to check back and retrieve facts needed to complete a problem solving operation. This ability becomes more critical when problems have many aspects that need consideration and/or need to be solved mentally. This ability strongly determines how efficiently one handles the many aspects of normal life. If your short term memory ability is strong you are much less likely to seem inattentive or “slow to get it” to others.

Your Short Term Memory IQ score of 131 is not significantly different from your General IQ score. This score is better than 98.06% of all persons taking this test.

Rote Utilization

This is the ability to take a set of memorized facts and mentally extract and/or operate with or upon the facts within the set that are pertinent to the problem at hand. Persons with more of this ability can be expected to spell well, remember telephone and other numbers easily, be more adroit in procedural operations, and have a stronger foundation for tasks that require the use of memorized material.

Your Rote Utilization IQ score of 136 is not significantly different from your General IQ score. This score is better than 99.18% of all persons taking this test.

Algebraic

This is the ability of the mind to abstractly handle quantities and qualities. Persons who are strong in this ability can more quickly and more deeply understand analogies, stories, derivations, equalities, and hierarchical structures.

Your Algebraic IQ score of 134 is not significantly different from your General IQ score. This score is better than 98.83% of all persons taking this test.

General Knowledge

Knowledge that is casually picked up and remembered can indicate intelligence, because persons with higher intelligence will exhibit greater retention of those pieces of information that are encountered less often. Because higher intelligence allows a person to have a deeper appreciation of the connectivity of facts that may seem disparate to others of lesser intelligence, memory of such facts becomes easier.

Your General Knowledge IQ score of 132 is not significantly different from your General IQ score. This score is better than 98.36% of all persons taking this test.

Visual Apprehension

This is the ability of the mind to mentally picture visual information and to be able to extract portions of that information for separate use. A person whose visual apprehension is strong enjoys a richer, more creative appreciation of visual aspects of experiences.

Your Visual Apprehension IQ score of 133 is not significantly different from your General IQ score. This score is better than 98.61% of all persons taking this test.

Geometric

How well one can comprehend geometric relationships of lines, sides, planes, angles, and topological properties strongly determines one’s ability to make sense of visual information. The strength of one’s geometric ability can strongly determine how quickly knowledge can be absorbed if it is presented visually.

Your Geometric IQ score of 131 is not significantly different from your General IQ score. This score is better than 98.06% of all persons taking this test.

Vocabulary

Knowing the meaning of words is an ability that directly increases along with the increase of general intelligence. The meaning of a word is more easily remembered with higher intelligence, because it takes more intelligence to understand and correctly use words based upon the subtle differences between words with similar meanings and to comprehend difficult concepts which are sometimes symbolized by a single word.

Your Vocabulary IQ score of 127 is not significantly different from your General IQ score. This score is better than 96.41% of all persons taking this test.

Intuition

Intuition is defined as that ability of the mind to develop answers to questions without consciously dealing with the problem at hand. Often a question will provoke your mind to answer without using conscious processing time, and the answer is said to come “out of the blue” or “suddenly, it just struck me”. Of all the many abilities of the mind, this is one of the most often used. Just knowing what to do is often an automatic process that occurs without much conscious figuring. Those with stronger intuition make less mistakes and can seem luckier, wiser, or more mature.

Your Intuition IQ score of 132 is not significantly different from your General IQ score. This score is better than 98.36% of all persons taking this test.

Computational Speed

If you can correctly solve a variety of problems faster than another person, you may be demonstrating a generally more orderly internal arrangement of your mind’s problem solving methods. While speed cannot be the sole factor in determining overall superiority in one mental operations, in general faster computational speed will often indicate that a problem’s comprehension was more complete. With everything else being equal, a person with faster computational speed than another person’s will be better at tasks that require the synthesis of many bits of information.

Your Computational Speed IQ score of 103 is significantly lower than your General IQ score. This score is better than 57.93% of all persons taking this test.

why to study magic?

one can wonder why have i chosen magic practices as my next field of study as i have always been science oriented. well, the studies in different sciences have pushed me to take a closer look into magic. from physics and mathematics known butterfly effect and chaos theory show clearly that even insignificant changes in a system at the beginning may lead to enormous changes in the end. the effect of our mind on nature may not be visible instantly without a statistical analysis of thousands of experiments, but in long term our thoughts can create huge changes.

it is a difficult research because large majority of ‘magicians’ are charlatans, liars, mafia of religions, sects and cults, simply jokers and parody makers, or clueless beginners presenting themselves as learned magicians. also a great deal of mentally challenged people are in the mix. there are more books written about magic than in any other field, which makes it impossible to go through everyting. but at the same time it’s easy for me to quickly discard most of the stuff out there because of my previous studies. i will pick for a closer look the parts of magic which i can test scientifically, to measure the effect.

i can’t promise that i will come to any definitive conclusions but that is an interesting study anyway, because i like psychology. whatever the outcome of my studies about magic i will definitely learn something valuable about this world and people living in it.

as i have mentioned in one of my previous posts i’m already testing sigils, some of which i publish on my another (recently created) wordpress blog..
healthextension.wordpress.com
(the domain for quick access.. acio.pro)

one day i may put up prizes for those who guess correctly the meaning of the sigils.. and perhaps even some small prizes to those who come close to the correct meaning.

if you’re interested to sponsor the project or to collaborate in other ways then feel free to contact me..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2019/10/20/my-contact

please do not write me on the mail inf@usa.com which you can see on the post from yesterday, i have set up an automated response there which is directing to this blog to find the less crowded mailbox for business talks. i will try to respond to all mails which make sense to respond to, but on some mailboxes it may just take a long time to sort through thousands of mails. thus, to get a quick response please follow my request about on which of my emails to contact me on what topics. thank you for your comprehension.

no comment..

inbox of one of my business mails:

some basics of magic.

what i have learned so far about magic is that there is no need for all the ‘magic’ things, substances to consume or inhale, no need for any special settings or locations. that said, all this is not needed if one can get into a special state of mind without them. the thing is, that most of us do not have such capacity to control the mind, thus all the attributes are there to assist one into a required state of mind. there’s also a medicinal type of magic but that’s another story, i’m not going deeply into that. the medicinal type of magic is an early precursor of modern medicine. in the magic using special mental states every single thing in the setting is selected by magician and has a special meaning. i would compare it with an artwork like a movie.. everything in a movie is placed there to influence your mind, your emotions, and even your future actions by inserting subliminal messages of sponsors, so that after watching the movie one would buy their products and services. movies are like modern magic. ancient magical practices have a resemblance to inserting subliminal messages, but it can all be done with special spells as well, to influence your mind in certain direction. this is all understood by science, in psychology. what is of interest to me the most is how an influence can be achieved over other minds which are not present on a ritual and over nature in general, over physical phenomena. the research continues.

magic, real or not?

this year i’m planning to take a deeper look into magic practices, to educate myself in the art and see if there’s something real in it. i’m having an open mind as there are certain discoveries in science proving without a shadow of a doubt the incredible power of mind which is not limited only to human mind (listen to the waking cosmos podcast — there are talks with scientists who study the mind over matter phenomena). the effects of mind over matter and mind over mind are often very subtle, not having any significant effect on individual basis, but statistically, taking hundreds of thousands of tests over decades, the effects are there with a very high confidence level not leaving them to a pure chance. with all the research done and published, anyone denying the fact of our mind influencing our physical reality directly by still unknown connections is in the rank with proponents of flat earth, flat moon, sun, and flat mars with all the other flat celestial objects. maybe it’s because the still skeptical people living in denial are having a flat mind.. maybe, i don’t know — we need to scan the brains to find out. just because we don’t know yet how our minds achieve certain feats does not eliminate the fact: influence by our minds simply by thinking about something not physically connected to us (by known fields) is real.

the scientifically collected and statistically analyzed data speaks about the reality we live in — our thoughts do influence other minds and even sensitive electronical equipment. the proven effect of even prayers (i’m not religious by the way) on helping to heal people is so significant that even health insurance companies pay for prayers, because they save around 20% percent (in average) on medical expenses compared to people whom there are no healing prayers and/or meditation administered. for me, that has nothing to do with any religion or particular beliefs but with a human intention wishing well. it seems to me that subconsciousness, consciousness, will, intention, attention, and so on, these are real physical phenomena, not exactly the same as a placebo effect, because even people who don’t know that they are meditated upon with good intentions, are also getting real measurable benefit from it. again, on individual basis that effect is hard to measure and often unpredictable, but over thousands of individual cases it generates a significant benefit, so much so that even insurance companies have been persuaded to invest in the practice for their own financial savings. if one doesn’t believe in something that is real, it is still there, regardless of outdated scientific knowledge in old textbooks.

i will take a closer look into magical practices. i will try not to spend much time on the type of magic which is meant to deliberately fool people, but of course i need to learn about ‘show magic’ tricks as well, to be aware of trickery which is possible to explain with known physical phenomena. also, as i have educated myself in clinical psychology, it will help me in many cases which will come up during my research. my mission is to understand if there’s something in ancient and modern practices of real magic which would create certain “mind over mind” and “mind over matter” interactions. will see.

i already began testing magic symbols, “sigils”, to see the effect. some of the sigils i publish on my second wordpress blog.. healthextension.wordpress.com
.. there’s also a quick access domain for the new blog.. acio.pro

research on human special abilities.

one topic that has always been of interest to me is the special abilities of people, especially those abilities that science can’t explain. i’ve been curious to learn more about human extreme abilities as far as i can remember myself studying human nature. probably this curiosity comes from practicing traditional martial arts, since the age of nine. one can definitely read out this interest from my first book which i wrote and published over twenty years ago, the book “seeming reality” (you can download it for free). since then i have made many more experiments on my own. the results of some of the later experiments (after those mentioned in the book) i had published in social media, some five years ago or so, which i later deleted because i considered the time not to be ready for talking more about those experiments — it would have affected the ongoing tests at the time. now i can perhaps begin talking again about my own experiments and the results, i will think about it.

some twenty years ago i began seeking people with special abilities in my country and studied quite a few very interesting phenomenae that people demonstrated. also i had series of public lectures with demontrations of my students from my school of martial arts, which included some probable explanations to what my students had achieved as it seemed to be difficult to explain with pure physiology. since then i have left my country and traveled world quite a bit, thus my own direct research had stopped. i’ve been learning more mostly from internet. thanks to the information age it’s clear to me that those abilities of my students were not extremely special — there are many more people out there who have achieved that extraordinary physical capacity, and that is totally explainable by human physiology, just usually we are not used to train ourselves so far. now, few years ago, i began looking for people who would be interested to begin a new research of people with special abilities, but so far i have met little interest in it. people are scared that it will attract lots of “crazy” people whom will be hard to deal with. as for my own better understanding of people i have trained myself in psychology, i have looked into cultural and social aspects of psychology and also into clinical psychology. that i consider an important step, to know how to behave in dealing with people who are lightly mentally challenged and are perhaps hard to recognize as people with difficulties in dealing with reality, having sometimes their own reality instead. that said, i am not a professional psychiatrist but learning the basics definitely helps me in seeing the world from the perspective of other people.

so, i still keep in mind the idea to begin again the research of human special abilities, to find those with clear capacity for demonstrating phenomenae that are impossible to explain by current scientific knowledge. let me know if you wish to collaborate in this research and perhaps we can figure out the best way to move forward.

my contact data you will find here ..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2019/10/20/my-contact
__

the eternal good health.

https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2018/11/21/the-eternal-good-health/

(my article from year ago to read again)

becoming a street artist, maybe.

been thinking if i should try the life of a street artist. several times i have tried making money on the street, but never really living that life and traveling with this mindset.. these were just occasional attempts to see if it works in the area where i lived for a while. for over a month now i’ve been selling a “street paper” (a magazine) on street but that has too many limitations — i have a specified spot where i am allowed to sell and nowhere else, and each vendor of the magazine has a specified spot. that’s basically all i can do. if i would become a freelance street artist i would have the liberty in choosing my work place, it would free up my creativity and i would learn about the life of street artists which is also very interesting. the most important part of it is the freedom of movement.. i can pack my stuff at any moment to move to another town or country without being strapped down by agreements while working for someone else. got to give it a try i think, it would be a worthwile experience. first i’ve got to think through the art project which i would sell, because playing guitar, which i did in the past, is by now long forgotten.. my level of playing guitar would be too low if i would try to recall something and retraining myself would take too much time. now i have some better ideas for street performance but like with any business idea one got to think it through first.

a new meditation technique.

recently i advanced one of my meditation techniques, to improve the effect. i’ve been testing it for a bit now and i’m happy with the results. some of my older meditation methods can be discarded i suppose, because the new method makes a better impact. i need to keep testing though till i’m completely confident the new meditation technique truly works and the excellent results so far are not just a coincidence.

past social media accounts.

to avoid confusion and/or not to look like careless person i must tell to those who find some active social media accounts on my name or the name of my YE blog, please be aware that most of them are no longer attended by me. over the years i have tried so many different accounts that i haven’t been using many of them for a long time as not practical for my needs. for instance facebook, twitter, linkedin and others. some of them have been in disuse for so long time that i cannot even delete them because of new access rules.. for example some kind of ‘suspicious’ acivity detector demands me to call to several people whom i know, to get from them a confirmation code to access a long disused account. i don’t have time nor i feel the need to go through whole the proccess simply to delete the still active accounts which i no longer use. some platforms demand to call specific persons whom i have no phone contact with which makes access to the long disused account impossible, or very troublesome requiring opening a new account, contacting that person and explaining the situation etc., which is no guarantee of a success because as you know in social media most of contacts are people whom you never met. so, please be informed that if a certain social communication account doesn’t show the date of my last activity to other users it may still most likely be an unused social account. please confirm with me directly, by phone or an email before trying to contact by social media platforms. after all there’s always a possibility that someone else has gained access to my old accounts simply because i have traveled world so much and changed so many phone numbers over the years which have been used to create the accounts. it even happened to me once that with a new phone number one social account activated all the data and contacts of the previous user of that phone number.. it was quite a job to delete them all because that particular service didn’t have an option to delete all old contacts at once for security reasons. you get the point. please talk to me personally, by any video options or voice call, if you wish to be sure the message is delivered to me and not into the web wide void with a wrong or no answer.

my books, download options.

there are some unexpected changes forced into my plans.. very soon my books will only be available to download on wordpress until i will decide to publish them somewhere else as well. my ‘sellfy’ account https://sellfy.com/youthextension will soon be terminated.

here’s an excerpt from an email which i received from ‘sellfy’:

/…/ You have been on our transaction fee only plan (Legacy plan) since you signed up for Sellfy on 09/18/2016 /…/ Due to considerable technical adjustments in our platform and supporting services, we are forced to discontinue the Legacy plan on February 1st, 2020 and switch into supporting subscription-based plans only /…/

well, for me it doesn’t make an economic sense to begin paying for publishing my books which are available for free. the ‘sellfy’ platform offers an option to pay to artists/writers by those who enjoy their work but the reality is that these days almost nobody pays for something that is available on internet for free. if you wish to support my work you can still do it by my paypal account.. https://www.paypal.me/yez

all and any support very welcome. thanks.

here are the direct links..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2019/10/18/direct-links-to-download-my-books-synopsis-description-below

Featured

direct links to download my books, synopsis / description below.

my YE account on ARCHIVE.ORG ..
https://archive.org/details/@youthextension

shared posts on health..

https://healthextension.wordpress.com

shared art posts.. https://cdp.art.blog

research.. https://donation.science.blog

donate if you can.. my contact

below are direct links to download my books — all free and permitted to share (further down you’ll find short desctiptions of the content):

Continue reading “direct links to download my books, synopsis / description below.” →

my books free download

Seeming_Reality_free

RndFlct_Full_fre

Selected_Proverbs_AK_free

AHC_160918_free

..will update the post later adding descriptions etc.

ten commandments

10 commandments for any and all religions.

discovered and learned from life, from the creation of gods.

don’t ask the gods to change anything, there already is a plan.
learn the language of gods — mathematics — it’s the same in every human language. that’s the only way to learn about the plan of gods.
learn sciences — it gives you special powers. don’t ask from gods more than you’ve got — gods have given you brain and all you need. discover the nature and apply your special powers.
don’t pay to anyone to worship gods. gathering and talking about gods is free. money is a tool, the means to exchange work for advancing special powers, the science, but not talking about gods.
don’t worship gods by useless activities, don’t build places for prayers. don’t pray. only worship gods by using the brain for what it was given to you — to discover the nature for what it is.
don’t go anywhere to feel closer to gods. don’t create anything to represent gods. do not create idols. gods are everywhere, not in a special place. you can be in touch with gods in any location with the help of the language of gods — mathematics.
don’t be afraid of death. there is no death, for anyone. the death only exists in minds of those who are still alive, to those who seem to be dead there is nothing including no death.
change the world for better — gods have given you the powers to change the world, it’s in the plan – you’re created in the image of gods.
never stop living the life in order to complain to gods. all that happens is in the plan, just move forward using the most powerful tool given to you by gods — your brain.
don’t steal. don’t steal life from others, don’t steal health, don’t steal freedom, don’t steal peace of mind, don’t steal truth, don’t steal knowledge, don’t steal happiness, don’t steal wellbeing, don’t steal property and so on. you can do anything you like but whatever you do don’t steal.

a philosophical question.

there’s quite known science theory out there which have shown that in the space of one cm3 anywhere in our universe there’s enough energy to create all the visible matter. it also means that releasing that energy, which is usually in quantum equilibrium and thus having no effect on surrounding matter, you could destroy everything as far as we can see in the universe. in fact, to destroy the planet, the solar system, and the entire galaxy, the necessary amount of energy is present in space way less than one mm3, so the theoretically possible bomb could be of a size less than naked human eye can see. the philosophical question is would you trigger such a device? would you end all the suffering that living beings must endure, or would you let it go on? is the life us such — not yours, the business of life in general — worth the suffering in the name of little joy which even not every living being knows of? ..

trading

it’s been quite a while since i last wrote about my trading tests. it was in september last year when i promised to write as soon as there are some news. well, testing mathematical formulas in real time trading, be it virtual or real money, is a long process before coming to definite conclusions. i had quite a success in making money with virtual currencies, but in finding an investor who would trade real money with my assistance hasn’t been a success at all. investors want to know too much, while i need to keep some parts of my mathematical strategy to myself, to be part of the deal and not casted away. it’s not easy to find a compromise between proving the point without a shadow of a doubt and keeping some trade secrets.

before coming to conclusion that my formulas do work, it wasn’t without hurdles. the testing accounts which i mentioned in my previous posts on trading became inaccessible few months ago. in fact three of my android devices crashed irreparably (all of them during a few weeks period, one after another), thus i bought three new android devices to make sure i will be able to continue working on my projects. but i did not succeed to access the previous testing accounts anymore regardless the access codes were nicely backed up. neither it was possible to recover/reset the accounts because the metatrader4 and metatrader5 demo accounts do not have an email or a phone registration.

never mind, i didn’t waste time and opened new testing (demo) accounts. after making some profit and continuing the tests to increase the profit i lost access to these accounts as well. then i decided not to keep any demo accounts on trading — as soon as i arrived to a reasonably positive balance, making between 1% to 5% profit (in average it took only couple of weeks of trading time while making tens of trades a day), i deleted the accounts and opened new ones. like this i continued and am continuing my tests now. so far there has been over 20 different demo accounts where i made profit, only one of the test accounts is open right now to continue till i will arrive at positive balance.

apart of forex currencies i also began test-trading gold and silver. so far i have a success, but from my earlier studies about stock market i remember that trading precious metals brings on heavy taxes, thus i’m trading gold and silver just from mathematical curiosity. my math works with the same success on trading gold and silver.. even better than i expected.. but at this time it’s early to be confident about trading precious metals because i began trading these very recently. in fact my formulas should work the same on trading anything on stock market when there’s sufficient volatility.

read more on this topic in the category TRADING

an opinion about blogging..

i’m still quite busy with my new work, and with learning new things for my work, having just enough time to catch up with world news and to rest a bit as well. meanwhile i’ve been receiving quite an annoying amount of promotion mails from wordpress and i see that my wordpress blog is so full of ads that one can hardly see the content posted by me. come on, to have ads before and after each post is too much.

to remove the annoying ads i should pay for the service wordpress provides, which is normal, but here’s my take on it: as not a professional full time blogger i see no return on the investment. i’ve been having several websites for around fifteen years and spent literally tens of thousands of euros for domains, website service providers etc., plus i spent years on building and updating the sites with my content. then i tried several free social platforms as a new phenomenon and kept my expenses low with paying only for domain names. the result: last year i decided to give away all my books for free as nobody paid for a full version, only free versions were ever downloaded regardless the fact that the “advanced handwriting cryptography” search on google showed my books on top of the first search page.. my method of handwriting cryptography is still the strongest there is in the world but who cares — the topic is too specific it seems, to have any larger interest. my books on other topics are perhaps just too hard to promote with so much competition out there. about sponsors: the only sponsors i ever had were my friends who know me from real life. thus, it’s been fun and exciting to work on the online projects wishing to gain more time for writing new books, but the reality proved the idea wrong — i must work double — i need to have a job that gives me income and to work for online content, while the project of writing new books is by now abandoned. that must change. the blogging hasn’t provided me with a single cent of income (apart from a small ‘symbolic’ support from friends), thus spending more money and lots of time on it is out of question. that’s the result of my reality check.

what else, to keep complaining.. my few years old tablet and recently bought smartphone crashed irreparably during the last month, so i got a new one, one of the very latest and a powerful model, but the wordpress app is crashing on it immediately after opening. i must use the web browser to post.

thus, to take it all together and thinking about my time well spent, i’m just not seeing any benefits in blogging. i may continue posting from time to time but honestly i must concentrate on activities that are more efficient in every sense. i’m happy enough with my life that i don’t need to show it all to the world.

have a good one everyone who followed me and keeps following, you never know, one day i may have nothing to do and will continue posting on the blog.

documentary crisis.

yesterday i searched online for new documentaries in different languages for an hour, with no success. all supposedly new documentaries are only old ones reposted again, or are on some useless topic, for me anyway. i did succeed to find four documentaries and downloaded them but all of them turned out to be a total crap — wishful thinking, stories without evidence and so on, presenting themselves as documentaries. too bad. aren’t there really people out there anymore, in the entire world, who keep making real documentaries on truly educational topics, or all of them are now being blocked by big brother to keep the level of understanding of people on very basic level. what’s happening is the question to answer now.

nothing to worry about.

it happens sometimes that i’m asked if i’m not afraid to get killed. well, my usual response is that if one succeeds in it then all my problems will instantly be eliminated for ever, but the one’s problems will only begin for a long time to come, wishing to be in my place instead. thus, i’ve got nothing to worry about.

mind control.

controlling own mind is no different from controlling own body, the same electrochemical processes, but controlling mind has less limitations.

not the real benefit.

statistics shows that religious people live in average longer, fact, but their net time spent on bs (bad science) dwarfs any gain, thus it is not benefit for life but a waste of life. stupid people are happier, sure, but if better is to be stupid to live longer is everyone’s choice. as one has said: “the fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one”.

about predicting the future.

one cannot tell the future. once the future is told anyone can change it. one can only know the future and watch it come true, if oneself don’t want to change it.

about the climate alarmists.

for me it’s like listening to the flat earthers, to listen to the global warming alarmists. yes the world has been warming a bit for a while (not anymore), so are you going to change the cycles of the sun and the activity of volcanos, etc.?! there are almost countless scientific reasons why i am confident we humans are not the cause, not only the fact of sun cycles and volcanos — it is impossible to count all the reasons for warming/cooling in any given time period (except in catastrophic events) because the oceans are a heat sink and are creating a time lag, but nevertheless the effect of humans on climate is tens of thousands of times smaller than the effects of natural events — i have written about it in detail many times for over ten years. after all, that may even be a good thing that the world is warming, because a single volcano with a big enough bang can bring an ice age to earth, so better we be warmed up enough to survive. about the pollution by humans it is another story — yes we can.. to destroy the balance in nature. but about climate.. it’s like the story of flat earth over and over again. please learn the real science, not political science with twisted facts and data just to fit the agenda of total control by government.

déjà vu — already seen.

scientists desribe déjà vu as a feeling that a particular situation is familiar to you, even if you have never experienced it before, a false memory of a current happening. i disagree — it is the description of not the true déjà vu phenomenon. i have had many times the true déjà vu experience. when i was much younger i even put it on test, because the ‘already seen’ memory events were longer back then, allowing to change my actions and see what happens next. for example in one case i was sure i had seen the exact situation just a few weeks before in a dream and one woman was about to appear from behind the corner of the building, where i should have seen her up close. instead of going towards that corner of the building i turned, made a few steps and stopped to see if the woman appears. she did.. exactly the same woman, and walked exactly the same way as i saw it in my dream. these experiments with déjà vu (i didn’t know back then the term, but i knew the phenomenon exists and is nothing special) clarified to me that one can change the future which one has seen in dreams, or felt otherwise, which means that future is not predestined.

some memory training techniques a bad idea.

for years i have known about the memory training technique using imaginary sequences of events attaching them to required information to remember.. and it never attracted me regardless i am interested in improving my memory. not that i’ve got a bad memory but i do wish to make it better (i have my own techniques to train my brain). now i kind of get it why the above mentioned technique has never been interesting to me — it’s because you create imaginary made up sequences of events which may look like kind of hallucinations for your brain, creating more mess than benefit from memorized information. this my conclusion makes even more sense when i think back to the interview with the world champion of a memory competition who admitted that he was jobless for several years already not being able to find work. perhaps his general behavior was giving hints that his brain was full of meaningless made up stories (from endless trainings just to remember a small amount of necessary data). that’s my explanation now, for myself, why i never liked these specific memory training techniques. you better only acquire meaningful information and think logically, for your subconscious mind making sense of the information, supporting your thoughts and actions.

acting in similar way.

i wonder if other countries will begin acting the same way as the united states — not keeping its promises given to other countries for certain acts from their part, unilaterally cancelling taken obligations, and cancelling contracts claiming them invalid despite signing them.. could it lead to the russia responding with cancelling the deal of selling alaska, and other similar consequences by the international community.. will it wake up the americans.. or they will still be arrogant as ever? no idea, but it appears to me that something must be done in response..

New region in human brain discovered.

World-renowned cartographer of the brain, Scientia Professor George Paxinos, Conjoint Professor at UNSW, has discovered a hidden region of the human brain. The region is found near the brain-spinal cord junction and Professor Paxinos has named it the Endorestiform Nucleus. /…/

The Endorestiform Nucleus is located within the inferior cerebellar peduncle, an area that integrates sensory and motor information to refine our posture, balance and fine motor movements. /…/

https://www.technology.org/2018/11/27/neuroscientist-discovers-hidden-region-in-the-human-brain/

geopolitical nostalgia.

some ex-soviet countries are wishing to return to be part of russia, regardless not telling it out directly.. here’s just another hint .

“Based on the NSDC decision to impose martial law, the head of the General Staff – the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine – has ordered to put all units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on full combat alert,” reads a statement released by the Ukrainian Defense Ministry on Monday.

https://www.rt.com/news/444862-ukraine-troop-combat-alert/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

war coming..

“This morning at around 7 a.m. Moscow time, three vessels belonging to Ukrainian armed forces violated the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea… to cross the Russian border,” read a statement from Russia’s federal security agency FSB, which is responsible for maintaining the country’s borders.

https://www.rt.com/news/444815-crimea-ukrainian-navy-territorial-waters/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

genetic modification.

it may sound like a contradiction that i am for genetic modification to prolong human life, to get rid of diseases, while i’m against genetic modification of the food we eat. there’s no contradiction, because i’m against the way it’s done with food currently, without having proper knowledge how it will affect us in long term. it’s like some child finding a car and without knowing the rules of traffic nor having skills in driving, just finding out how to start the engine and change the gears, is pushing the car forward in hope it goes in desired direction.. maybe it will, for a short while, but the final result is unknown. i remind you that we humans are about one fifth (20%) similar with plants we eat, in genetic code, so don’t be surprised that for many years already there are happening medical/biological miracles, in bad sense. there are plants and parts of plants found growing from inside human body, where they shouldn’t be able to grow due to the natural selection in millions of years creating a barrier. now it is happening in ever growing scale, in some cases even inside the human body without any sunlight. this is the direct result of genetically modified food how it’s currently produced, for fast profit and without proper care, without knowledge of distant future how it plays out for evolution. we need to learn much more about the basic molecular chemistry, and that’s necessary to do, but not applying the incomplete knowledge playing with the lives of billions of people. the consequences may be irreversible. but, at the same time, if the purpose of it is to clean up the world from too many people, then that may work. i suppose that’s also the reason why the scientists who modify our food genetically never eat the genetically modified food themselves.. and they admit that, for intelligent enough people to take notice. obviously they know more than they are disclosing to larger public which is destined to follow the corporate propaganda.. the world wouldn’t need them anyway if the future is planned for smart people.

Julian Assange’s lawyers refused entry to the Ecuadorian embassy.

WikiLeaks said the Ecuadorian government had refused to give lawyers Aitor Martinez and Jen Robinson access to Assange this weekend. The longtime WikiLeaks editor faces a US court hearing Tuesday and needs to meet with his legal team to prepare.

https://www.rt.com/news/444795-assange-lawyers-refused-entry-embassy/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

speed and amount of time.

in the following description i mean the amount of time in width, not in length as the amount of time between two different points in time.. i will describe the amount of time passing at any given moment, in connection with speed.

both speed and amount of time change the rate at which information is flowing through an object. the rate of information flow depends on energy in the system (gravity, heat) and also on the amount of information in any given location (in vacuum there’s less information). for one who studies, acquiring new information, the time around seems to flow at a different rate, depending on the person letting the information in or bouncing it back. a person who had almost stopped learning after school years will talk for entire life about the truths remembered from that period.. the person’s relative time had ‘stopped’ (continuing only in physical processes of body), while for the one who keeps learning, the amount of time at any given moment, the rate of flow of information, is bigger, creating in essence larger life. a larger life can mathematically be described as a longer life lived, compared to those stuck in the past in their knowledge.

(it may sound like one who studies more will age faster, but as i explained in my previous writing the ‘aging’ as such doesn’t exist as a scientific measure — it is the cumulative effect of damage in your body. thus, by undoing the damage you will not age faster — you will stay in the same health for ever.)

only by counting time both in speed and amount (in average width) we can tell how much someone has lived (in comparative length, mathematically speaking). one can in a single lifetime live a hundred lifetimes of another, when counting the amount of information they have been through in their lives.

the eternal good health.

it’s time to write again about the possibility of life in eternal good health (which in theory should be the main topic on this blog). to those not aware yet, there are many living organisms that don’t get biologically older as they grow, retaining full functionality which in human sense would equal to being forever young. these ‘immortal’ organisms only die when being destroyed. thus the question is not is it biologically possible but can humans too evolve to that condition of never aging. in fact, i was sure about the possibility to never age (by acting in life properly avoiding the factors contributing to aging, like smoking, heavy drinking and other damage factors) already when i was perhaps twelve years old or so. then after a while i was educated into believing it is impossible, thus i left that idea behind, only to rediscover the idea years later by learning about advances in science which proved non aging being possible in principle, just not in humans yet. back then, during my first steps in understanding human biology, while learning that all cells in human body are completely replaced roughly in every seven years, it was my thought that this may be the key to eternal life. i was rather confused as i didn’t understand why this is not the case, why we age as all the cells are being constantly replaced — some faster some slower, but in the end every single cell should be renewed over and over, endlessly.. you should only avoid damaging yourself so much that your cells cannot replace themselves anymore, plus you must adopt the right thinking as the most important part of the slowing/stopping your aging.. i will explain below what i mean by the right thinking.

quantum physics has confirmed that thinking is an important part in creating our reality — observer is an inseparable part of the creation process (not necessarily conscious observer). thus, by thinking about ourselves who we are, we are creating our reality — not completely though because there are other processes around us, other ‘observers’.. your body is not completely isolated from the surroundings for your mind to have total control over its processes. when i was about twelve years old i thought that to stop our aging we only need to stop thinking about our own future as old people, stop planning/preparing our days as old people and keep acting accordingly in every sense, in every tiny bit.. i realized that we need to eliminate the thought of aging also from subconsciousness which actually has bigger effect on our body than consciousness/awareness does (but we are able to train our subconsciousness into the right direction with our conscious thoughts, and then the subconsciousness takes over our development, our physical/chemical processes not influenced by consciouness directly). our organism adapts and conforms to the way we want ourselves to be. it’s a bit more complex than this description because everyone around us exerts pressure on us how we must act according to our age, but you can in principle overcome these obstacles not being rejected from society. while acting by the norms of society for outside world to see, you can create in your mind for yourself a program which acts on your body taking it like a never aging substance, replacing all damaged cells and keeping you healthy. (please note that by latest scientific description the aging process only means diminishing of health — there is no such thing as aging in biological sense, it is only the cumulative effect of diseases/faults/defects in your body — the failure of your body to replace damaged parts, including in genetic level with shortening of telomeres. some organisms can keep telomeres in healthy length — they handle it without the cells getting out of control becoming cancer cells. we call it aging when we steadily look worse than before while in fact this is an overall effect of different failures, illnesses). you need to remain true to yourself (to your youthfulness) in your mind — not to worry about losing opportunities so to say.. your worries about short lifetime are forcing you to act fast on every seemingly good chance right now (not waiting for reasonable better choices in the future). you must always retain the mindset of being continuously young (healthy) and just beginning truly to live, with everything in life ahead rather than most (more and more) of the life being behind due to your chronological age. in fact the more you learn (if you do keep learning a lot), especially in different sciences, the ever more is ahead in your life than behind because you see more and more things in life which otherwise would have been unnoticed — with learning you’ll become less and less blind to the events and facts of nature around you, which without understanding (proper knowledge) wouldn’t make sense to you being ignored by your brain as irrelevant. the active learning process will keep your brain active and also your nerve cells will be better replaced, recreating the most important connections.. the science has advanced and now we know that new cells in brain do get created, not like they are a fixed amount at some stage in development (if you stop actively learning and exercising your brain in various capacities then that may become the case though). if you begin living in this mental state of actively using your brain too late, then up to that point where you adopted the right mindset, the part of health is lost of course, but even your younger self may perhaps be regenerated, with more effort needed. but if you make plans for life in old age then your body accepts that course of action — thinking yourself to be ill will easily make your body to be ill by the program you gave to your body. you must also eliminate contradictions in your mind by following the truth in every aspect of your life — a program with contradictions in itself is destined to failure — thus all the bs (bad science) must only be taken as fun, as entertainment (including religions), or customs of the society to get along. if wrong ideas about truths of nature are too deeply rooted in your daily actions then it will have serious consequences for your subconscious processes, which will lead to faster aging. your body does the best to follow your mind, so don’t be surprised about getting old with wrong thinking, telling lies to yourself and others, contradictions, and with preparing yourself to get old.. you’ll get what you wish for in your body.

my idea was, back then when making the first discoveries for myself about aging, that if you didn’t know that people get old and you had never seen/known old people, then your mind would adapt to that mindset much easier, leaving only the chemical processes in your body to care of the external damages. later i learned that internal cellular damages are not that easy to undo, but now i know that it is not impossible neither — there are living organisms that have solved this problem. in fact recent experiments with elderly have proven the connection of thinking yourself into being younger and getting physiologically better health as the result (not only subjectively) — the experiments were done with placing the elderly in artificially created old times for several weeks, where everything around them was like in the times when they were young.

i wish i was able to find proofs in different sciences earlier in my life, about the general fact that there’s no restriction in physics and biology to live forever (in principle.. there is not a single thing we know of that would forbid the eternal good health as the result of continuous physical processes), to evolve my thinking. education by wrong (not advanced enough) science had stopped me at some point, making me to believe it to be impossible to stop aging. now i’m back on track and hopefully i can find a way to undo the damage by wrong education, by the previous lack of my knowledge about the reality.

by now science has proven beyond any reasonable doubt that our mind is an extremely powerful entity literally producing our reality. there’s a limit though as we interact with other minds, but for our own body the power of our mind is almost limitless. it takes time though.. not every effect is instant like after your will to move your arms you can proceed according to your will in physical reality with almost no time lag. but if you create for your body (by your thoughts) the right program to act upon, then little by little your body will follow your will, up to molecular changes in your body. again, here’s important not to contradict to yourself, because you may introduce errors into the process.. for example acting contrary to your will by planning your future as older person, be it setting apart money for pension or other similar actions. then your body will conform with your future self as an old person — your mind will affect your body accordingly to perform the best.. according to your will.

here i must stop the explanation because it would include too many different processes in life and different sciences, including psychology, not only physics and physiology. i have still a lot to learn and i don’t want to make errors in my description of reality which wouldn’t be backed up by science. i leave most of my thinking processes to be known to myself, to compare with the results and to select the correct processes to describe later when confirmed by the results. i will write more if i do succeed to stay young and perhaps even better: to reverse some damage done as i’m almost fifty years young now.. some ten-twenty years less in my biological age (in the best possible health) would be a much needed progress. just a note: food does make difference too but is not the most important ingredient (including alcohol — everything must be taken in moderation) — nobody has achieved eternal good health even with the best diet — food is just a collection of waves/particles and forces between them. your mind is more important in arranging the basic elements into desired configurations. also the thinking process itself must be used in moderation.. you can burn yourself out if you’re not taking enough rest to let the changed arrangement of particles to fix their positions. you can create a mess by thinking too much — your mind has a huge capacity for action but up to a limit.

there could be more details described related to the topic in this writing, in the fields like stress management, conflict management, ongoing human mutations and the benefits from research in those rare strong mutations, hypnosis, self-hypnosis (auto-hypnosis) and in many other fields, even martial arts — completely related. fortunately there’s enough material up there on internet on the related fields, thus i’m closing my short description of this quite complex research by only mentioning there’s a lot more to it than just doing nothing and thinking yourself into eternal good health. you must do a lot of research to arrive at correctly programming your mind the way it truly works.

ps. i understand perfectly well that a serious writing on such a topic must include references to the scientific sources to back up the claims i make, for example about the biologically never aging organisms. definitely it would be a better way to write, but in this case i should spend ten times more time (or perhaps even much more than that) on writing, to search through all the information out there on internet for the correct and seriously presented material. there’s so much garbage out there on internet that instead of spending time on seeking out reliable references i would rather rely on my memory referring to certain scientific discoveries/conclusions made by other researchers. i would rather spend my time on learning new things. in other words, to get it straight and to be entirely honest, i’m not lazy to write but i don’t care too much if others believe me or not — i’m happy enough to get it right for myself and to implement the discoveries and/or reasoning in my own life. the proof will follow — either i get older as everyone else does or will succeed in slowing/stopping/reversing the biological ‘aging’ processes in my body, staying forever in great health.

about my current health: i’m not in a perfect health but i feel myself great.. most of the time. i have had some damages to my body, from a serious car accident and other incidents, permanently changing some cellular structures of my body the way it cannot repair/regenerate itself completely into the previous healthy state, but fortunately not so much that medicine wouldn’t be able to restore the often annoying conditions into perfect health, in presumably not so distant future. damages to one knee (rebuilt from five pieces), arm (deeply burnt), ribs (broken and grown together not exactly right), spinal column (vertebrae slightly displaced/squeezed in two locations) and lungs (punctured and healed with a scar), not to talk about some smaller damages to my physical body, are completely possible to eliminate with advances in genetics, stem cell technologies and bioprinting. i’m calling my health great after over a dozen near-death situations in my crazy past — i live perfectly happy life, with only occasional need to take prescribed strong pain-killers, which i would better not take if possible to eliminate the underlying problems. you see, i’m not that far yet in controlling my mind that i can get rid of the pain at will.. not always i should say.. and better i won’t because pain is an important signal that something is wrong. i’m working on eliminating the damage, trying to regenerate the condition i was in before the car accident (over twenty years ago) and other incidents. there’s a lot to learn about myself and the limits of my mind and i’m working on it.

dark energy, dark matter and gravity.

just got an idea that perhaps dark energy, dark matter and gravity are related.. that dark energy which pushes the universe apart exerts the pressure that we call gravity. if that’s the case then dark energy may also account for the pressure which creates extra mass called dark matter. it may also be the case that gravity is not a weak force after all, that the rest of the force is connected to the space which expands it, while the dark matter is a separate unit. will think further in the morning..

note: gravity should be an effect that exchanges information faster than speed of light, instantly, or the celestial objects would fly apart — the time which is needed to cover the space between objects would not let them affect each other the way they do, the objects would be in different locations in space by the time gravitational information arrives to them, like in case of light for example. the thing called gravitational waves is misleading, the waves are due to shaking of space from collisions and explosions, as a result of gravify in most cases, but gravity itself must be instant across whole the universe, or, the gravity can just be a result of another force like dark energy, not a force by itself.

another note: years ago i proposed that gravity may be due to blocking out extremely long waves of cosmic scales, similar to casimir force at microscopic level. that effect also could account for dark energy because the blocked out waves must have opposite force exerted into the universe.

negative zero — more uses.

although there already exist several uses of negative zero (signed zero), i propose other uses for it.

zero means nothing, so negative zero could be used in reference to everything there has ever existed, exists and will exist, including everything there has ever been imagined, is currently imagined at this very moment, and will ever be imagined. negative zero could represent everything, but is not the same notion as infinity. perhaps a special symbol for it would do better, to avoid confusions, but in absence of it the negative zero can be used to describe the idea with the existing symbols, in certain context. it should represent everything as opposed to nothing, which is represented by zero, thus 0- (not -0) would do for this concept.

also, there should be a symbol to represent absolutely nothing, an “exclusive nothing” which is an impossibility. zero represents nothing which doesn’t exclude values or other notions outside zero. exclusive nothing is impossible because we exist, and something will always exist after we are gone and our universe is gone. nevertheless the notion of exclusive nothing will clarify the point of departure in certain conjectures, in explaining possibilities and impossibilities. exclusive nothing is in essence the notion of everything there is — the exclusive nothing itself, which is the only observer of itself, with nothing else outside of it. exclusive nothing is everything in itself, the true nothingness. this notion could also be represented with negative zero: -0 (not 0-), in absence of a special symbol, but it would clarify logical reasoning better if these two types of negative zero would have their own special symbols.

thus, here’s my proposal..

negative zero representing everything: minus sign attached to zero after the number zero or crossing the zero on that attachment point, whatever symbol is easier to build on an electronic device with available tools, or in absence of merging capacity: 0- = “above observable nothing”;

exclusive zero which means ‘absolutely nothing with no outside observer’: minus sign attached to zero before the number zero or crossing the zero on that attachment point, whatever symbol is easier to build on an electronic device with available tools, or in absence of merging capacity, -0 = “below observable nothing”;

..other special symbols representing the above described concepts could also be used/proposed if there already don’t exist symbols representing these ideas, perhaps proposed by others before.. i didn’t find other similar proposals by my quick look on internet, but to be honest i didn’t do proper research neither, no time.. i just wrote down the ideas, the concepts, to clarify my thinking.

universe will always be..

universe (in sense of everything) couldn’t have a beginning, because before the beginning had to be something that caused the beginning, and that something in turn had to have its own cause, and so on backwards to the infinity (even if the notion of time would lose its meaning in certain conditions in our known physics). it also means that universe will never end, because there cannot exist such state as nothing at all. if there was nothing then there would have forever been nothing, but as we are here to confirm the existence of the universe (as the current state of existence) then the universe/multiverse/whatever has always been and always will be, that’s the only possibility. there cannot exist such a state as nothing because nothing by itself cannot exist — there wouldn’t be an observer of the nothing because an observer who determines the nothing would be something. in other words, if state of nothing would be possible then the nothing would be everything there could be, which is not the case. therefore, only existence is possible.

ampere, kelvin, kilogram and mole redefined.

Scientists will soon ditch a specialized hunk of metal that defines the mass of a kilogram. /…/ every measurement of mass made anywhere on Earth is tied back to this one cylindrical object. Known as “Le Grand K,” the cylinder, cast in 1879, is kept carefully sequestered in a secure, controlled environment outside Paris.

On November 16, at a session of the 26th General Conference on Weights and Measures in Versailles, France, representatives of countries from around the world voted to /…/ redefine several units of measurement, including the kilogram.

/…/

On May 20, 2019, Le Grand K will lose its special status, and the mass of a kilogram will be defined by a fundamental constant of nature known as the Planck constant. At the same time, other mainstays of the metric system will also be revamped: the ampere (the unit of electric current), the kelvin (the unit of temperature) and the mole (the unit for amount of substance).

/…/

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/official-redefining-kilogram-units-measurement

causation and/or coincidences.

the more i listen to the lectures in different sciences the more i see/hear baseless assumptions. many of those assumptions were taken from thin air (“educated guesses” as proposals for further scientific investigation) and in the end the logical/mathematical deliberations had produced the right answers.. but in fact different sets of assumptions can in some cases lead to the same results. also in physics. we cannot always be sure that the results are based on underlying facts of nature (which are not measured directly) or are instead mathematical similarities with different phenomenae, coincidences (universe repeats itself due to the laws the universe is built upon, thus coincidences are rather a rule than rare exceptions), not proving the underlying assumptions. the more complex some theories are growing the more difficult is to get it all right, without including speculations.

nb! in so many science lectures the scientists are laughing themselves about several components included in their formulas, which have been taken out of nowhere, just to get the right results, expecting these new inclusions to be proven by observations later. i personally see nothing there to laugh when scientific terms are misused — even as i understand the sense of humor in their talks and i like science presentations with some good humor included, one should take science more seriously and not call such things ‘theories’ but what they really are: scientific speculations. which is not in a bad sense though, you must try something to get to the truth, but calling a calculation with many baseless assumptions (or ‘conjectures’, as scientists like to say, to confuse and convert others into believers in the proposed formulas/logic) a ‘theory’ is a way of making science cheap and may end up with some scientific notions losing their value and respect.

about coincidences in mathematics: for example right now there are two completely different ‘theories’ in physics on how the universe began, with absolutely different starting assumptions about the reality, but both are leading to — by precise calculations built on the assumptions — exactly the same proven and measured results. only more precise measurements in future can perhaps discard one of the theories as not valid.

same with the gravity: some scientists assume that gravity is negative energy (regardless the theoretically presumed field never being measured directly nor particle being found), some say gravity doesn’t exist (einstein) but is only the effect we see due to the warped space, and yet others say that gravity is a statistical phenomenon, something like entropy. all of them provide their mathematical calculations and arrive to the correct results. oh, i forgot to mention the theory of quantum gravity which also claims to be correct. thus we can’t be sure which assumption about gravity corresponds to reality.

therefore, as long as physicists keep arguing between themselves about underlying truths of nature below our observable reality, i have all the rights to propose my own theories about the reality of relations between physical phenomenae, based on my observations, while discarding some accepted ‘truths’ about physics which are not making sense — don’t correspond to the reality based on my obsevations in nature.

here are some notes to think about:

it seems that einstein had made an error in his thought experiment about gravity, claiming that acceleration/deceleration and gravity are the same effect, that gravity doesn’t exist but is the phenomenon arising from curvature of space. these effects look similar but are off by factor of too many. imagine how much a small acceleration/deceleration must (un)bend the space to account for the same effect that gravity produces. solving this error could free us from the speed of light being the absolute speed limit in the universe, fixing it only to certain special circumstances.. which in turn would solve the mystery of “spooky action at distance” — the effect of quantum entanglement, the mystery of inflation and several other ‘impossible’ facts about our universe, like information exchange in cosmic scale not letting it to collapse into lumps. perhaps gravity acts faster than speed of light and is the result of quantum entanglement between objects (the latter i made just up, a quick speculation so to say).

if matter warps space-time, and black holes have so much gravity that even light can’t escape, why is it that the gravitational lensing improves our vision of farther away celestial objects, not diminishing the light as it should fall into the black hole which warps the space.. where is the logic? is it taking light in and gathering even more light from around? due to the lensing there should be areas with less visibility instead of improved visibility of farther away objects.. or.. perhaps the black hole shouldn’t be visible at all (as a black area in space) because the warped space should close in without leaving any trace of the black hole, like a visibility cloak does (invisibility cloak). and what about time differences due to the gravitational lensing? (please note there’s a huge difference between the lensing principle of light passing through a magnifying glass which bends gathered light and the lensing by a black hole which absorbs light).

relative time clarified.

regardless of the form of energy pumped into a system, be it gravity or heat, more time is created, thus from local point of view (in the system) time speeds up (regardless of not being noticed from inside the system about the system, when there’s nothing outside to compare with). the outside system’s life lags behind, like you’re moving at high velocity, and for outside observer, in which system there’s less time available, the observed high gravity (or high temperature) system’s time goes faster. the high energy density system has spent more time when counted at the meeting point of the two observers where time equalizes.

just imagine that time is like a flow of points:

more time in the system: ………………..

less time in the system: . . . . . . . . . .

in this sense “more time” doesn’t mean time is streched but in contrary to that — time is compressed, more time is squeezed into the local space, into the area of the system with high energy density. thus for yet another (third) observer, with whatever time density, the person in the “more time in the system” (more energy: heat, gravity) has aged more rapidly in comparison between the first two, when meeting at the point where two time flows have equalized.

thus i was correct that physics textbooks have an error in it. traveler at close to speed of light, with acceleration and deceleration pumping up gravity, increases local time, with that for outside observer in outside timeframe the traveler has passed more time, aging faster.. and is not arriving in the future (this is a fundamental error in reasoning, in the physics textbooks). the traveler had simply aged more than it would had happened by moving slowly. this makes way more sense than the commonly accepted description by physicists trying to describe time travel. there’s no such thing as time travel — you will always arrive to the same time flow where you left off (in the new point in time where the local time has arrived to), but you have aged faster at high energy densities, which also means at high time densities.

again, as i have mentioned in my earlier writings, everyday examples only prove my reasoning: we refrigerate food in order to preserve it, slowing its local time. even people are being frozen these days (cryonics), to wake them up in the future, to cure them from deadly conditions not curable today. one cannot travel to the future or to the past [sending data as quantum states may be possible, but not objects with a mass], only to speed up or to slow down local time. time flows like a fluid, like heat. there’s no doubt in my mind anymore that time is not constant but a flexible unit, we are just so used to the physical facts around us that we don’t realize how time flows at different rates in objects around us, depending how much energy is in them. perhaps heat (the temperature above absolute zero) is the very thing that we call time.. but that may be a leap too far in my thinking. definitely temperature and time are correlated.

please note that these results are based on general thought experiments, not on precise calculations. there’s a physical limit to how much i can take on in my life.. at this point in time i have other priorities. to make precise calculations i will need to revisit the truths of mathematics and physics, not to make any mistakes. i leave making of precise calulations to professionals in physics and mathematics.

transfer of data by quantum entanglement: the solution.

i just finished my today’s urgent ‘missions’ and began thinking about the data transfer, before going to sleep, expecting that if i won’t get any good ideas then when i wake up in the morning i will think deeper to find a solution. but for my surprise, just a few minutes into the thinking process, i came up with the solution. (actually i was not sure it’s possible but i was prepared to dedicate some time for it, just because i like to work on hard problems which are considered impossible.. then nobody can blame me for being lazy if i won’t succeed in finding a solution). at least i think so that i found a solution, it’s much easier than i thought it would be.. but it depends if the technology allows to keep the measuring state of particles for some short period of time or the state of the particle decays instantly after measuring. (if i remember right it shouldn’t be a problem but i must do some research to confirm this possibility – there’s always a chance that i remember something wrong in some subjects, or someone had explained something wrong by mistake which i had happened to study). if it’s possible to keep the quantum state with the fact of observation/measuring then here’s how it works..

you only need two pairs of separately entangled particles. the sending side will measure the quantum states of particles let say thousands of times in a second while the receiving side only measures once a second, with precise intervals. if both particles on sending side will be in the same quantum state, it will be sending a ‘zero’, when different states then ‘one’. the sender will measure particles as many times as needed until the required pair of states comes up by the random results during measuring, then stops and waits the receiving side to measure the quantum states of the entangled particles. after one second has passed the sending side starts to measure the states of particles again thousands of times a second, to arrive at required combination before the measuring time on the receiving side, and so on.

thousands of times more is required at the sending side to ensure that by random outcome there won’t be hundreds of times in a row coming up a wrong combination of states. if i estimate correctly then a thousand times in a row to come up with a wrong (not desired) combination at random, just for two different states of equal probability, it’s something like once in a lifetime of the universe chance (with a huge reserve to account for any very improbable outcomes, for glitches in the system so to say).. a thousand measurements on the sending side to arrive at desired quantum states on a pair of particles is enough, for each measurement on the receiving side.

[writing it down took longer than coming up with a solution.. i consider it just having a right idea at the right moment, a lucky coincidence, as i’m not strong at complex math.. i prefer simple solutions and finding patterns, instead of solving formulas.]

ps. if that is a true solution and it is possible to send data this way faster than speed of light, through entangled particles, then the cause and effect principle is broken and in principle we could get information from the future and send information to the past, which will create many issues, at least in our brain, initially. but if physics allows it then we must just wrap our brains around the reality and solve the seeming issues.

addition: when reading the above description of the solution just an hour later, to fix possible errors in grammar, i realized you don’t even need two pairs of entangled particles — the same can be done with the single pair. i began with a more complex way to solve the problem, instead of a simpler solution, and got fixated on it. in any case i don’t understand why physicists are still talking about the impossibility of sending information by entangled particles, due to the random nature of their states at any given moment of measurement.. you measure as many times as needed till you arrive at desired result, in your allowed time frame, and wait for the receiver to measure the opposite state of the entangled particle. no problem whatsoever, only the clocks of both parties must be precisely calibrated, for the correct measuring intervals, but even (re)calibration of clocks can be done by separate entangled particles. therefore, because of the necessity to precisely re-calibrate the clocks at great distances (due to the difference in gravity, dark energy influence which may be at different levels etc.), to avoid errors in data transfer, at least two pairs of entangled particles is a better way to go.

quantum entanglement for data transfer.

there’s a theoretical possibility (should be, in my opinion) of transfering data by quantum entanglement as emergent properties of math, using several separately entangled particles, regardless of impossibility to transfer data directly (due to random outcome of measurements of quantum states) … you only need to work out the formulas how to do that … as easy as that. maybe tomorrow i’ll work on this problem, today i’ve got other urgent things to do.. 🙂 😉

negative gravity.

one theory suggests that at very high energies gravity can actually become repulsive (negative).. which is what explains the inflation (and therefore also negative entropy <- my addition) during the big bang. take that to chew on, with all the implications the theory provides. it would mean my thoughts about the relation of temperature and time hold true, when at some point during huge acceleration/deceleration close to speed of light the time reverses its relative speed, because of the negative gravity. in any case: wow… what else physicists can come up with just to fit their theories into any circumstances nature provides.. but it explains everything. the question remains if only the explanation fits the reality. but it does also help my theory of relation between temperature and time — if i got something wrong in my thought experiment then i only need to reverse gravity at some point and the results will be right.

absolute zero is also the limit of time.

while my reasoning is definitely not complete and i must learn a lot about reality of physics for every part in my arguments, here’s another speculation (read previous posts): you could go back in time only if you could create negative temperature, below absolute zero. so far even truly absolute zero has never been achieved — there are still above zero energy fluctuations left on lowest level of temperature. in my view this is so because you cannot stop time, not to mention about going back in time. the temperature and time relation still holds in my mind, but as i said i’ve got still a lot to learn. i’m not a trained physicist, just an engineer by education. unfortunately i can’t learn everything at once, thus some parts in my reasoning remain often just educated guesses rather than facts based on known science.. known to someone else but for me yet to learn.

energy creates time.

the more energy is pumped into a system the more time is created, therefore the relative slowing of time during acceleration and deceleration close to speed of light, which creates local gravity, which in turn increases time, which creates the sense like time is slowing down but in fact just more time is created. perhaps not a news but i wrote it up to think further about the relation of temperature and time, another day.

reference to my previous post on relation of temperature and time.

the relation of temperature and time.

if entropy is the measure of time (i’m not sure but seems plausible) and the change in temperature changes the rate of entropy, then temperature change also changes the speed at which time flows at any given location. thus time is not flowing at constant speed. close to speed of light time slows down significantly as it is well known.. but even at local level molecules of heated materials speed up quite a lot, which is a paradox because time should slow down, not speed up which is what happens with the physical processes in heated materials. at absolute zero time should stop.. which is not the case, thus my reasoning may have a flow in it — maybe temperature change does not change the flow of time. but perhaps it is not a paradox: if time slows down in heated materials it is slowing for fast moving molecules, while for outside observer the time goes faster compared to the local time in heated up materials. i’ve come to these thoughts again and again over many years and i’ve written about this in my different blogs several times years ago.. and it is still bothering me from time to time.

there’s also a possibility that the slowing of time has been described fundamentally wrong as someone made an error in the thought experiment and the error carried on in physics textbooks with no-one daring to address the error. you see, if you move at high velocity everything flies past you at high speed.. same to the outside observer watching the speeding object, thus the relativity principle is preserved. or if the clocks are ticking at different rate you must admit the existence of ether, about which i argued with physics teachers already when i was perhaps in 5th grade or so. it has never made me sense why in absence of ether one clock should slow down at high velocity between observers while both reference points are equal.. in this case the relativity principle is lost. thus i always argued that existence of ether is proven to me by the very principle of slowing time at high velocity — the reference to the motion of time is not another observer with equal result regardless of from which side to look, but the ether. the error though is in how it’s described — the traveler at high speed should age faster in reference to those not speeding. in this case the fact that in heated up materials, where molecules move at much higher velocity, have also higher rate of entropy, makes sense — the time in the heated materials goes faster compared to the time of observer. the time is relative even in our everyday actions — this is why we refrigerate food for it to last longer, to preserve it, to slow down its rate of aging.

ps. by now i’m a bit smarter and have an understanding that slowing of time is not due to speed but due to gravity, while the speed only plays role during acceleration and deceleration, which creates local gravity, which in turn slows down the time. if one moves with high velocity at constant rate the time is equal for both observers, thus the relativity principle is preserved. but the heating process, accelerating of molecules, still bothers me — it should change the rate of time locally, relative to observers. bouncing molecules decelerate fast while accelerating other molecules, which process creates local gravity, which in turn slows down time.. or speeds up from reference point of an outside observer.

[it’s two o’clock at night here in italy.. i woke up about an hour ago and can’t sleep on this question, again.. so i had to write it all up fast to get some rest. therefore, any errors allowed]

new lie detector.

When someone lies, the temperature of the tip of their nose drops by up to 1.2ºC while that of the forehead rises by up to 1.5ºC. The reason for this peculiar phenomenon is that lying causes anxiety, which manifests itself in the temperature of the nose. The greater the difference between the nose and the forehead, the more likely that the person is lying.

https://www.rt.com/news/443636-nose-temperature-lie-detector/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

wars derived from physics.

it is very natural that if we are stuck on earth there will be ever bigger wars. this is required by the physics of increasing entropy. to stop this we must get out to space to expand our life beyond earth. anyone not willing to work in spending energy in that direction of development, be it even as a supporting agent to help those advancing science, is promoting ever more violent wars.

the purpose of life is to increase entropy.

by the laws of thermodynamics and the principle of maximizing entropy we should never die and keep reproducing.. which is the condition we are evolving into. the nature seems not have found the solution yet, for humans, but sure it will. many living organisms have already achieved the mechanism of immortality in principle, dying only when being destroyed. so why humans also? because we are capable of spreading out to the universe with the same physical goal: to increase entropy. the existing immortal organisms have reached their limit of spending energy being bound to earth. as with humans, immortality will not happen to those stuck in superstitions and religious mindset — those are the dead ends of evolution. the life will only carry on with those expending maximum energy — which is done by brain — thus the scientific mindset, with the most possible energy used by thinking a lot about difficult problems, is very natural way of development in life. it is the most efficient mechanism to increase entropy in ever increasing pace. that’s what is required by the laws of physics, not by our will.

physics of mind.

matter is a perturbation in waves, be it another wave hitting a wave, or an observation.. which would mean our observations, our consciousness, are also waves, and we can change the reality with our will, our mind. thus it also makes sense why in most cases collective will has power over personal will, as it’s causing a bigger wave, unless collective will is weaker than an individual wave moving in one direction. collective will can be weaker than individual will due to moving in many directions smoothing the wave out, while an individual or a small group can create a powerful unidirectional wave riding over the smooth indecisive will of collective mind.

sounds like a philosophy? nope. i came to this by keeping an eye on developments in physics, namely on studies of quantum reality. for example electrons have propability waves and only the act of measuring (an observation) will locate the electron, but it can also be found in another location. the theory has hold for a very long time without alternative better explanations which would make sense. for me it looks like these probability waves are just the locations with strong enough waves where perturbations can occur, creating the electrons. once the perturbation occurs there’s not enough energy of the wave left in the system for the perturbation to occur in another location, for another electron to be created, but it could have been created in other locations of the system if measured first, collapsing the wave.

Cell Phones Cause Cancer.

There is now ‘clear evidence’ that cell phone radiation can cause cancers of the heart, brain and adrenal glands, a landmark National Institutes of Health (NIH) study warns.

A final report, released today, confirms the preliminary findings that were released in 2016 after scientists were alarmed by early indications that cell radiation may be carcinogenic.

https://www.infowars.com/clear-evidence-cell-phones-cause-cancer/

Russia to hold live missile drills outside Norway amid massive NATO drills.

The Russian military will hold the live missile firing drills on November 1-3, amid the ongoing Trident Juncture 2018 NATO exercise. The war games kicked off last week and will go on until November 7, with over 50,000 personnel, some 10,000 vehicles, 250 aircraft and 65 ships participating.

https://www.rt.com/news/442665-norway-russia-missile-drills/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS