Category: ALL WRITINGS

Scientists measure electron spin qubit without demolishing it.

A group of scientists from the RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science in Japan has succeeded in taking repeated measurements of the spin of an electron in a silicon quantum dot without changing its spin in the process.

read the article..
https://phys.org/news/2020-03-scientists-electron-qubit-demolishing.html
_

‘Oppression, arbitrary detention & torture will happen to journalists if extradition is successful’ – Assange’s father.

If Julian Assange’s transfer to the US isn’t stopped, other journalists and publishers face the imminent risk of being persecuted, detained or even tortured, his father exclaimed as his extradition trial got under way in London.

read the article.. https://www.rt.com/uk/481550-assange-father-extradition-trial/
_

time is not constant.

if you take a single moving molecule, it seems like entropy has occurred — time has passed — by the movement, but if the molecule arrives back to the same location, then no time has passed for its reference frame. even if the molecule will arrive to the exact location after millions of years, taken from the reference frame of other substances with changed entropy, for the molecule which had arrived back, nothing has changed in its location, its frame of reference, like time has not passed, or is turned back. it is very unlikely event though, by the probability, but because there are countless interactions of molecules and particles, then it does happen countless times as well. of course, way more often happens in the universe, that while there is a great change in entropy for some substances, then in other substances nothing changes for millions of years — the time isn’t changing there because there is no change in entropy. time is only the measure of entropy, not a constant flow by itself, thus time is flexible, dependent on the influencing factors on entropy, like gravity and temperature. again, there is no such thing as constant flow of time for all reference frames, even in our everyday life. i’m not talking here philosophically, but strictly about physical reality. the less change in entropy you have in your body, the less you age. it is also about your brain — it takes energy to keep your brain cells alive, to keep the connections and to create new connections. it requires effort. the less you care about things in the world, the faster rate of entropy you have in your brain, by the neglected brain cells dying out. it has an overall effect on your body. the less brain cells you have left, the less control your brain can exercise over the physical processes in your body, becoming less and less capable in repairing and replacing damaged cells. it results in the accumulation of damage, which we call aging.

please refer to my previous atrticles on entropy and time, and also on gravity, space and temperature, to have a better understanding.

_
my posts on the YE blog on the subject of entropy..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/?s=entropy
my posts on the YE blog on the subject of time..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/?s=time
_

the mistakes in lorentz transformation.

the problem with lorentz transformation is that during calculations the frames of reference are changed arbitrarily to fit the presumtions. if you stick to one reference frame from the beginning till the end, then there will be no time dilation. the space-time interval comes directly from the lorentz transformation, and if i remember correctly, big part of the relativity conclusions by einstein was based on the lorentz transformation. you see where it is heading to?!

_
the errors in logic are clearly visible from the graphical representation of the lorentz transformation.. or to be precise — from several assumptions represented in the graphical form, plus the arbitrary transformation itself. watch the video below first, then read my detailed explanation of every mistake in the logic there.

just a note: the presenter in the video is not stupid, he talks by the book, but that’s the problem which i have encountered in so many academic discussions — some truths are considered not questionable, because some supposedly even smarter people have worked it out. nobody is perfect, so you should always question even the most established mathematical formulas. if not, then an error in logic can carry on into entire fields of mathematics and physics, wasting lives of generations of scientists trying to solve some issues, unsolvable with the formulas with errors in them. i wish i had more persistence decades ago, to insist on the clear errors in the theory of relativity, but back then i had no idea of the mistakes in the lorentz transformation, so i wasn’t absolutely sure i had my conclusions right.

watch the video presentation and i will explain the mistakes..


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kefr8d2fHgE

so, lets discuss it..

in the beginning of the explanation the curve of different ticking clocks is arbitrarily bent — they should have been on the same level on the time scale. even worse — he sais time ticks slow to travelers, while in fact by this arbitrary graph the travelers had passed more time on the time scale, aging faster than the stationary observer — total contradiction. or, it would make “sense” only if the reference frames are arbitrarily taken, without a fixed reference point, resulting in a mathematical nonsense.

next. in the video, for the zero time of the moving object, the previously horizontal line of space axis is arbitrarily tilted to connect the 45 degree lines of light. big mistake. the connecting lines of light are very much of different length, which means they are not reaching the moving object at the same time. the horizontal plain of space axis should have been left unchanged, if the reference frame was stationary. the “sloped x-axis”, even if permitted to manipulate from the reference point of the moving object, is sloped in a wrong direction. the entire presentation is a total mess of arbitrary assumptions — it perfectly shows all the mistakes in the lorentz transformation initial inputs, and in the frames of reference.

the line of the moving object can never tilt beyond 45 degrees, which is correct, because it would mean exceeding the speed of light, but the connecting lines which are longer will show redshift while the shorter lines will show blueshift, if the space is expanding and contracting respectively. in the example though the light simply arrives at different times, not in zero time as presumed in video, by unknown to me logic.

i’m not done with the lorentz transformation yet — hold onto your chair. in the end of the video he grids up the traveler’s reference frame (with all the errors of logic in it) and squares up everything. why?! by the same logic he could as well square up the reference frame of the traveler, without any transformation.

you see.. in the formulas without graphical visualization it is easy to misunderstand the connection of lines of time as a reference only, but in fact the lines represent physically passing time — the length of the connecting lines must be taken into account. only the vertical and horizontal axes must be taken as reference lines, without arbitrarily applying the same property of reference to the passing time. and again the issue with arbitrary reference frames — in case of space-time one cannot mess around with the frame of reference, because it would mean jumping space without time. if you want to change the frame of reference during your calculations, you must account for the passing of time during that change of space, which will nullify the whole point of lorentz transformation, because the time dilation will disappear.

_

the very idea of applying lorentz transformation for time dilation is absurd, it’s just an abstract mathematics full of logical errors not corresponding to reality. the time dilation don’t take into account the complex movement of celestial objects in aether. read the article to get a clarification about aether — it is there and proven, just not in all the textbooks yet..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/10/the-biggest-lie-in-the-universe-literally-the-claim-that-aether-doesnt-exist/
.. the displacement of galaxies related to each other is already with the speed of millions of kilometres per hour, so if an object takes a hike from earth it may in fact be slowing down, relatively speaking, instead of speeding up, or even more realistically, as earth also orbits sun, and solar system has its orbit in galaxy, then a “stationary” observer will be wobbling around. but that’s not the real point. the real point is that the relativity principle is not preserved during lorentz transformation. all those calculations and graphs are based on the presumtion — on a thought experiment with a flaw in it — that time moves slower on a moving object close to speed of light. the mistake in lorentz transformation is visible not only from its graphics, but from the very presumption that a speed of an object slows time. i have written about it before — if you perform the same calculations after flipping the stationary and moving reference frames, then the slowing of time will be result for another object, not to the same as before. both results, directly opposite, cannot be correct at the same time.

here’s an article with the detailed description of the error in the theory of relativity..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/12/the-clocks-paradox-not-resolved-contrary-to-claims/

it’s time for the mathematical community to wake up and scrap lorentz transformation for time dilation, with whatever consequences it may bring to the understanding of reality.

show me the lorentz transformation with correct input of data and with a single reference frame for the duration of the entire calculation. then perform the same for each reference frame separately, without mixing them arbitrarily.. and come to the same answer with each separate calculation. it is impossible. if you can do it, i will take my words back and will post an article that i was wrong.

_

the missing antimatter explained. the grand bang theory.

the missing antimatter could be explained simply: the aether exists everywhere, also beyond our universe, and different universes with more antimatter than matter are floating in the ever present aether. the universes are different similarly as stars in the universe have different elements in them. all the universes in the aether balance out the amount of matter and antimatter to total sum of zero.

it also means that entanglement of particles could exist between different universes and we may be able to get information about the other universes.

the process of creation of several universes at once could explain the rapid expansion in our early universe. after the initial uniformed expansion, the areas with the equal amount of matter and antimatter collapsed back to nothing, contributing to the more rapid expansion (inflation) of the area which is now our universe. it could perhaps be proven, as the previous surrounding areas, the other early universes which had collapsed, should have left some measurable traces to our universe.

the big bang could have been even bigger, a grand bang, but after the annihilation of matter and antimatter in large areas, the distances between the rest of matter had grown so large, that it limited the reach of interactions of forces. then the grand bang resulted in different lumps, in different universes.

_

read more..

my posts on the YE blog on the subject of aether..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/?s=aether
my posts on the YE blog on the subject of gravity..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/?s=gravity
my posts on the YE blog on the subject of time..
https://youthextension.wordpress.com/?s=time
_

true nothingness as singularity of reality.

here i explain why true nothingness has instant presence with no time lag, instead of no presence at all. first of all, again, true nothingness is not the absolute nothingness, because the observable existence excludes the absolute nothingness as a possibility. contrary to the abstract notion of absolute (exclusive) nothingness, the true nothingness below the quantum reality has properties. true nothingness is real, because without it there would be no structure in universe — true nothingness is the ultimate wall, stopping anything from collapsing any further under great pressure, connecting observable reality only by quantum entaglement. because gravity and time are interrelated, and true nothingness has no gravity, then the speed of time is infinite, which is the same as time is instant, without a lag. the instant time in true nothingness can also be viewed from its different property — as true nothingness has no space, as it is the singularity of reality in itself, it needs no time for the effect to take place, in any location. this is why the effects of quantum entanglement are instant.

the imaginary abstract absolute nothingness cannot be in touch with any possible observable reality. in contrast, the true nothingness, is in touch with the universe, it arises from the universe, from the observable reality — it is one of the fundamental properties of the universe.

the true nothingness, the singularity of reality, isn’t a single invisible point somewhere in the universe, beyond universe, or simply an imagination — it is everywhere, below the observable and measurable reality, connecting the universe into one entity with instant exchange of information. particles and waves cannot pass through the singularity, but information by the entanglement can — the information is present everywhere, about the whole universe.

read more.. https://youthextension.wordpress.com/2020/02/18/the-properties-of-true-nothingness/
_

about the redshift of distant galaxies.

there can be another explanation to the redshift than the expansion of the universe. as empty space is not totally empty, has mass and gravity, then it has effect on time. the more mass and gravity is between distant objects, the more it slows time, which creates the redshift of distant galaxies. no expansion of universe means no “dark” energy needed, to account for the expansion. this makes perfect sense while considering that background gravity is uniformly distributed, coming from quantum fluctuations in empty space. it is slowing the passing time (speed of entropy) just enough to stretch the light into longer wavelengths. the redshift of distant galaxies could be due to dragging of the light.

there may be something missing in this idea.. but maybe not. i have made mistakes before, in case of the redshift, thus i must think more and learn again about some things in physics — especially to find out if the textbook theories still hold true or are already considered inadequate.

_
by the way, some of the errors in my previous posts i don’t correct, to see myself later how my thinking and knowledge has evolved. as i’m not a professionally trained physicist then i can permit to myself to have errors in my descriptions of reality — i have no job of a professor to lose, nor degrees or tenures. nevertheless i do my best to get to the truth, and to correct at least the errors of syntax.. and also expressions of thoughts, adding clarifying comments if necessary.. in some older posts as well from time to time.

_