about the climate alarmists.

for me it’s like listening to the flat earthers, to listen to the global warming alarmists. yes the world has been warming a bit for a while (not anymore), so are you going to change the cycles of the sun and the activity of volcanos, etc.?! there are almost countless scientific reasons why i am confident we humans are not the cause, not only the fact of sun cycles and volcanos — it is impossible to count all the reasons for warming/cooling in any given time period (except in catastrophic events) because the oceans are a heat sink and are creating a time lag, but nevertheless the effect of humans on climate is tens of thousands of times smaller than the effects of natural events — i have written about it in detail many times for over ten years. after all, that may even be a good thing that the world is warming, because a single volcano with a big enough bang can bring an ice age to earth, so better we be warmed up enough to survive. about the pollution by humans it is another story — yes we can.. to destroy the balance in nature. but about climate.. it’s like the story of flat earth over and over again. please learn the real science, not political science with twisted facts and data just to fit the agenda of total control by government.

déjà vu — already seen.

scientists desribe déjà vu as a feeling that a particular situation is familiar to you, even if you have never experienced it before, a false memory of a current happening. i disagree — it is the description of not the true déjà vu phenomenon. i have had many times the true déjà vu experience. when i was much younger i even put it on test, because the ‘already seen’ memory events were longer back then, allowing to change my actions and see what happens next. for example in one case i was sure i had seen the exact situation just a few weeks before in a dream and one woman was about to appear from behind the corner of the building, where i should have seen her up close. instead of going towards that corner of the building i turned, made a few steps and stopped to see if the woman appears. she did.. exactly the same woman, and walked exactly the same way as i saw it in my dream. these experiments with déjà vu (i didn’t know back then the term, but i knew the phenomenon exists and is nothing special) clarified to me that one can change the future which one has seen in dreams, or felt otherwise, which means that future is not predestined.

some memory training techniques a bad idea.

for years i have known about the memory training technique using imaginary sequences of events attaching them to required information to remember.. and it never attracted me regardless i am interested in improving my memory. not that i’ve got a bad memory but i do wish to make it better (i have my own techniques to train my brain). now i kind of get it why the above mentioned technique has never been interesting to me — it’s because you create imaginary made up sequences of events which may look like kind of hallucinations for your brain, creating more mess than benefit from memorized information. this my conclusion makes even more sense when i think back to the interview with the world champion of a memory competition who admitted that he was jobless for several years already not being able to find work. perhaps his general behavior was giving hints that his brain was full of meaningless made up stories (from endless trainings just to remember a small amount of necessary data). that’s my explanation now, for myself, why i never liked these specific memory training techniques. you better only acquire meaningful information and think logically, for your subconscious mind making sense of the information, supporting your thoughts and actions.

acting in similar way.

i wonder if other countries will begin acting the same way as the united states — not keeping its promises given to other countries for certain acts from their part, unilaterally cancelling taken obligations, and cancelling contracts claiming them invalid despite signing them.. could it lead to the russia responding with cancelling the deal of selling alaska, and other similar consequences by the international community.. will it wake up the americans.. or they will still be arrogant as ever? no idea, but it appears to me that something must be done in response..

genetic modification.

it may sound like a contradiction that i am for genetic modification to prolong human life, to get rid of diseases, while i’m against genetic modification of the food we eat. there’s no contradiction, because i’m against the way it’s done with food currently, without having proper knowledge how it will affect us in long term. it’s like some child finding a car and without knowing the rules of traffic nor having skills in driving, just finding out how to start the engine and change the gears, is pushing the car forward in hope it goes in desired direction.. maybe it will, for a short while, but the final result is unknown. i remind you that we humans are about one fifth (20%) similar with plants we eat, in genetic code, so don’t be surprised that for many years already there are happening medical/biological miracles, in bad sense. there are plants and parts of plants found growing from inside human body, where they shouldn’t be able to grow due to the natural selection in millions of years creating a barrier. now it is happening in ever growing scale, in some cases even inside the human body without any sunlight. this is the direct result of genetically modified food how it’s currently produced, for fast profit and without proper care, without knowledge of distant future how it plays out for evolution. we need to learn much more about the basic molecular chemistry, and that’s necessary to do, but not applying the incomplete knowledge playing with the lives of billions of people. the consequences may be irreversible. but, at the same time, if the purpose of it is to clean up the world from too many people, then that may work. i suppose that’s also the reason why the scientists who modify our food genetically never eat the genetically modified food themselves.. and they admit that, for intelligent enough people to take notice. obviously they know more than they are disclosing to larger public which is destined to follow the corporate propaganda.. the world wouldn’t need them anyway if the future is planned for smart people.

speed and amount of time.

in the following description i mean the amount of time in width, not in length as the amount of  time between two different points in time.. i will describe the amount of time passing at any given moment, in connection with speed.

both speed and amount of time change the rate at which information is flowing through an object. the rate of information flow depends on energy in the system (gravity, heat) and also on the amount of information in any given location (in vacuum there’s less information). for one who studies, acquiring new information, the time around seems to flow at a different rate, depending on the person letting the information in or bouncing it back. a person who had almost stopped learning after school years will talk for entire life about the truths remembered from that period.. the person’s relative time had ‘stopped’ (continuing only in physical processes of body), while for the one who keeps learning, the amount of time at any given moment, the rate of flow of information, is bigger, creating in essence larger life. a larger life can mathematically be described as a longer life lived, compared to those stuck in the past in their knowledge.

(it may sound like one who studies more will age faster, but as i explained in my previous writing the ‘aging’ as such doesn’t exist as a scientific measure — it is the cumulative effect of damage in your body. thus, by undoing the damage you will not age faster — you will stay in the same health for ever.)

only by counting time both in speed and amount (in average width) we can tell how much someone has lived (in comparative length, mathematically speaking). one can in a single lifetime live a hundred lifetimes of another, when counting the amount of information they have been through in their lives.